Sponsored

The great meaningless engine poll

Pick one.


  • Total voters
    630

viper88

Well-Known Member
First Name
Nick
Joined
Apr 22, 2018
Threads
44
Messages
5,510
Reaction score
5,588
Location
IL
Vehicle(s)
'19 JLR 2.0T (past), '22 JLR 3.6 (present)
I'm sorry, but if you think Jeep can not engineer a cooling package for a 2.0T in a Gladiator you are mistaken. There is absolutely nothing hard or unusual about fooling 4 cyl turbos for trucks. E.g. Ranger.
Here is one article of many. There are others. Some with a lot more details. There was/is a great technical sheet out there explaining the limitations of the 2.0T for the Gladiator. It had the engineers explaining everything they tried and why it was not feasible. They left nothing on the table. The 2.0T is a excellent motor but not for the Gladiator's towing requirements. And I am not a hater. I loved the 2.0T in my old JLR. It is just what it is.

https://www.off-road.com/blog/2018/12/06/2020-jeep-gladiator-wont-offer-2-0l-four-cylinder-engine/
 
Last edited:

gato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2021
Threads
20
Messages
1,251
Reaction score
1,938
Location
New England
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLUR
And what do the 3.0 diesel & 2.0 have in common?
Nothing really. The 2.0T has a very sophisticated integrated exhaust gas cooler pre-turbo and integrated (in the intake) charge air intercooler post turbo. It also has very sophisticated spark ignition timing controls not available on the diesel.
 

gato

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2021
Threads
20
Messages
1,251
Reaction score
1,938
Location
New England
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLUR

Sponsored

Strommen95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Threads
10
Messages
1,507
Reaction score
3,513
Location
New York
Vehicle(s)
2022 GMC Canyon
I'm sorry, but if you think Jeep can not engineer a cooling package for a 2.0T in a Gladiator you are mistaken. There is absolutely nothing hard or unusual about fooling 4 cyl turbos for trucks. E.g. Ranger.
One my favorite things about the internet, is reading someone make a baseless claim, be proven wrong quickly and naturally it's never acknowledged. Zero accountability.
 
OP
OP
AnnDee4444

AnnDee4444

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Threads
49
Messages
4,720
Reaction score
6,325
Location
ā€Ž
Vehicle(s)
'18 JLR 2.0
I appear to be running into late-week retardation.
Me too.

On that note, I'm opening up the poll to unlimited choices... because it's possible to buy more than one Jeep.
 

Pig-Pen

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
May 29, 2018
Threads
81
Messages
4,026
Reaction score
6,250
Location
Eastvale, CA
Vehicle(s)
2018 JLU
Occupation
jabroni
Clubs
 
Poll needs more LSX

and not even a Hellaphant option?!
 

Sponsored

SouthCo

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Jan 12, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
573
Reaction score
556
Location
MD
Vehicle(s)
2018 JLU Billet Silver Sahara
On that note, I'm opening up the poll to unlimited choices... because it's possible to buy more than one Jeep.
Was nice to see what the stats were when one vote per person. I mean if I bought a second Jeep it would be the 3.6 again because I like it that much. But I understand some may not feel the same about their first choice or wanted a change the second go around for another reason.

Hands down all the motors make their owners happy. But definitely more votes for the 3.6 as a motor alone and just barely more for the 3.6 as a powertrain (as you put it earlier)... I didn't expect to see that for some reason.

Pretty good poll for a meaningless poll as you put it...

Jeep Wrangler JL The great meaningless engine poll 1642178518292
 
OP
OP
AnnDee4444

AnnDee4444

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Threads
49
Messages
4,720
Reaction score
6,325
Location
ā€Ž
Vehicle(s)
'18 JLR 2.0
Poll needs more LSX
I guess I was trying to keep it relevant to something that could be offered in the JL. Unless GM buys Jeep or Jeep buys the tooling for the LS... I don't see that happening from the factory. Of course I used to own a Jeep with a factory installed Buick V6, so who knows what could happen.

and not even a Hellaphant option?!
Hmmm... good point. Granted.




Was nice to see what the stats were when one vote per person. I mean if I bought a second Jeep it would be the 3.6 again because I like it that much. But I understand some may not feel the same about their first choice or wanted a change the second go around for another reason.

Hands down all the motors make their owners happy. But definitely more votes for the 3.6 as a motor alone and just barely more for the 3.6 as a powertrain (as you put it earlier)... I didn't expect to see that for some reason.

Pretty good poll for a meaningless poll as you put it...

Jeep Wrangler JL The great meaningless engine poll 1642178518292
People are still going to vote for what they're interested in. I would never consider a 4-door, but I'm still interested in the 392.
 

Jmos4

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Nov 28, 2021
Threads
14
Messages
473
Reaction score
562
Location
48444
Vehicle(s)
2020 Challenger Scat Pack M6/2007 Ram 2500 G56
Of course I used to own a Jeep with a factory installed Buick V6, so who knows what could happen.
Hi,

Back in AMC days they also put the Buick 350 in Waggoners and all AMC V8's used the lousy Buick oil pump/front cover....

Regards,
Jim
 

RudeJeepin

Well-Known Member
First Name
Carl
Joined
Jul 31, 2021
Threads
1
Messages
328
Reaction score
613
Location
Washington
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLURD
I currently have the 3.0 diesel and would buy another if I was to replace my current one. But I'd think about the 392 or similar V8 if I was to get a second Jeep. I'm also curious about the new I6, turbo, no turbo, eboost.
I'd also think about the 4xe, if someone else would agree to pay for replacement batteries when needed. It's a Jeep so more than likely I'd have it long enough to need to replace the battery pack.
Sponsored

 
  • Like
Reactions: AFD
 



Top