Sponsored

Metalcloak lock-n-load vs Game changer

Yellow Cake Kid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
Threads
107
Messages
980
Reaction score
619
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep
...Given the angle of the rears you lose about 20% vs front straight travel...
That is a good point, which I had not considered when I made the post.

Thank you.

This made me curious, so I approximated the dimensions by using an assumed 45 degree angle, which is probably a bit slacker than the actual angle of the shocks, but does illustrate the point you are making about the angles.

Jeep Wrangler JL Metalcloak lock-n-load vs Game changer Jeep Rear Shocks geometry


Then I realized I could easily go out and measure the resting angle of the rear shocks on my Jeep. I measured 63.8 degrees, so I made a second illustration that approximates the dimensions by using an assumed 64 degree angle.

Jeep Wrangler JL Metalcloak lock-n-load vs Game changer Jeep Rear Shocks geometry 64 degrees


Thanks again for mentioning the need to acknowledge the angle.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

GATORB8

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
May 30, 2021
Threads
29
Messages
8,831
Reaction score
11,729
Location
CLT NC
Vehicle(s)
21 JLURe, 06 LJ, 25 HDZR2
That is a good point, which I had not considered when I made the post.

Thank you.

This made me curious, so I approximated the dimensions by using an assumed 45 degree angle, which is probably a bit slacker than the actual angle of the shocks, but does illustrate the point you are making about the angles.

Jeep Rear Shocks geometry.jpg


Then I realized I could easily go out and measure the resting angle of the rear shocks on my Jeep. I measured 63.8 degrees, so I made a second illustration that approximates the dimensions by using an assumed 64 degree angle.

View attachment 729441

Thanks again for mentioning the need to acknowledge the angle.
FYI per AnnDee's data, the length of shock at full metal-metal stock (non XR) bump is 17".
 

Yellow Cake Kid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
Threads
107
Messages
980
Reaction score
619
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep
It looks like that figure is referenced from a thread where @Trill was raising the axles, without a spring in place, until the upper and lower spring mounts were pressed against each other.
 

AnnDee4444

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
5,529
Reaction score
7,951
Location
‎
Vehicle(s)
'18 JLR 2.0
FYI per AnnDee's data, the length of shock at full metal-metal stock (non XR) bump is 17".
This is really just a close enough number... almost all Jeeps are +/- 1"


That is a good point, which I had not considered when I made the post.

Thank you.

This made me curious, so I approximated the dimensions by using an assumed 45 degree angle, which is probably a bit slacker than the actual angle of the shocks, but does illustrate the point you are making about the angles.

Jeep Rear Shocks geometry.jpg


Then I realized I could easily go out and measure the resting angle of the rear shocks on my Jeep. I measured 63.8 degrees, so I made a second illustration that approximates the dimensions by using an assumed 64 degree angle.

Jeep Rear Shocks geometry 64 degrees.jpg


Thanks again for mentioning the need to acknowledge the angle.
Here's what I've been using:

A = Suspension Height (actually vertical distance to top of shock)
B = 11"
C = Shock Length

Jeep Wrangler JL Metalcloak lock-n-load vs Game changer 1679508440472


There's a little more related discussion for a few posts in this thread: https://www.jlwranglerforums.com/fo...-information-chart-matrix.66591/#post-1435337
 

Yellow Cake Kid

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
Threads
107
Messages
980
Reaction score
619
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep
The reason I considered my post an approximation is that the angle of the hypotenuse or the length of the "B" leg of the triangle varies as the axle complies with the arc of the Control arms.
 

Sponsored

AnnDee4444

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
5,529
Reaction score
7,951
Location
‎
Vehicle(s)
'18 JLR 2.0
The reason I considered my post an approximation is that the angle of the hypotenuse or the length of the "B" leg of the triangle varies as the axle complies with the arc of the Control arms.
Good point... Doing some quick math (and using Metalcloak's standard arm lengths) A fully drooped stock Rubicon moves the axle forward less than 1/2". Obviously more droop would make this worse. Strangely, even though the pinion angle change is bad for the drivetrain (it will point further down with more droop due to the shorter upper arm lengths) this rotates the stock shock brackets up allowing for slightly more droop than if the pinion stayed consistent. It's not enough to counter the axle moving, but technically exists.
 

Headbarcode

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Threads
26
Messages
7,755
Reaction score
18,018
Location
LI, New York
Vehicle(s)
2019 JLUR Stingray 2.0 turbo
Vehicle Showcase
1
Hey!

Corious.. why choose 3.5" of backspace with 72.5" axles? and not, let's say 4.5" ? I am just curious.. :)
Good catch! Thanks for bringing that to light! I actually just went back and changed that sentence from 3.5" to 4.5" of backspace. That's what I get for typing a few words at a time in between the buckets of material I'm feeding into a trommel. That post you quoted probably took me over an hour to finish. ?

The point I had intended was that 3.5" of backspace is necessary to push the limits of total suspension travel with the factory 68.5" wide Rubicon axles. Downside, of course, is the extreme scrub radius. The best setup, in my opinion is 72.5" (or there abouts) axles and 4.5" backspace. That allows plenty of large tire stuffing clearance, while keeping scrub radius at a more moderate level.
 

CaJLMetalHead

Well-Known Member
First Name
CAJLMetalHead
Joined
Sep 6, 2018
Threads
19
Messages
969
Reaction score
1,873
Location
96049
Vehicle(s)
Jeep Wrangler Sport Unlimited
Good catch! Thanks for bringing that to light! I actually just went back and changed that sentence from 3.5" to 4.5" of backspace. That's what I get for typing a few words at a time in between the buckets of material I'm feeding into a trommel. That post you quoted probably took me over an hour to finish. ?

The point I had intended was that 3.5" of backspace is necessary to push the limits of total suspension travel with the factory 68.5" wide Rubicon axles. Downside, of course, is the extreme scrub radius. The best setup, in my opinion is 72.5" (or there abouts) axles and 4.5" backspace. That allows plenty of large tire stuffing clearance, while keeping scrub radius at a more moderate level.
Ohh ok.. you had me concerned for a second there.. LOL...
 

Sponsored

johnpeters

New Member
First Name
John
Joined
Aug 3, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
ford
Determine the lift height you desire for your vehicle. Different kits offer varying degrees of lift, allowing you to choose the one that suits your needs. However, keep in mind that extreme lifts can affect the vehicle's handling and may require additional modifications.
 

DustinD

Member
First Name
Dustin
Joined
May 22, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
none
I searched but could not find much information or reviews on the lock-n-load lift kit. Is there a benefit to lock-n-load over Game changer or vice versa?

My off roading will be mainly rocks, Johnson Valley/ Cougar Buttes.

Ed
Lots of owners report great flex and road manners with Game Changer: one Redditor said “I have a 3.5 Game Changer on my JLU … flex is awesome, last year … there were several times where my rig was the only one that didn’t lift a tire.
Sponsored

 
 







Top