AnnDee4444
Well-Known Member
Absolutely.I agree about redactions. And I liked the That 70's video.
But the full article doesn't change the gist ("truth"). If the extra wear problem had been solved, the (20 month old) article wouldn't refer to potential technology to mitigate it. Based on the data provided, it's not clear the current and forthcoming technologies do/will even fully overcome the ~10x wear factor. Even if they did, as long as any starting wear exists ESS carries a wear penalty (i.e. ~10x more engine starts will still cause more engine wear and shorten engine life relative to 1x starts on the same engine).
What isn't clear is what a 10X reduction actually means. Can the motor still cover a million miles? Half-million? What is acceptable to be considered "long-term", and does ESS actually reduce this? Or will the cost of gasoline skyrocket and keeping a ICE engine functioning will depend more on it's fuel economy than overall lifespan?
ESS (or whatever it's called) isn't exactly new technology either: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Start-stop_system#History
Sponsored