Air-fuel ratio, volumetric efficiency, ignition timing... this is anything but simple.JeepWranglerForums.com - the only place on the internet where HP produced vs fuel used is considered rocket science.
Guess I shouldn't be surprised that Beavis and Butthead would be clueless about such a simple concept.
![]()
If only there was a visual way to compare these engines... Like if a user created a comprehensive way to see what power, or torque a certain engine produces at a given speed....Air-fuel ratio, volumetric efficiency, ignition timing... this is anything but simple.
"nEVer ComParE DYno chArts!"If only there was a visual way to compare these engines... Like if a user created a comprehensive way to see what power, or torque a certain engine produces at a given speed....
Oh, hey @AnnDee4444 I didn't see you there with all those links in your signature.
But only if they're all dyno'd on the same dyno at altitude"nEVer ComParE DYno chArts!"
Uh, no. Compare all the dyno charts.
This right here is often overlooked by the 4XE haters and EV FUDs. These manufacturers aren't doing anything out of the kindness of their hearts or environment. It's all a shell game. No one is PUSHING EV's on the unwashed masses, save for the government. It's all about getting those credits so they can continue to make/sell the larger gas guzzlers. The gas-guzzlers we continue to buy...They are both good engines. Yes, I am partial to the V6, but I live at 1,400 elevation. I have driven through Colorado, and the Sierra Nevada mountains, but don't live there, so it didn't bother me. Jeep has to push the 4cyl because of the fuel mileage. They don't sell any EV's as of right now and the fuel credits are killing them. That's why the V8 is gone in the Ram trucks. For example, with GM for every Silverado/Sierra EV they sell they can sell 30 Silverado/Sierra HD trucks. For every Blazer EV they sell, they can sell 5 Silverado LD's. Same with Ford. They build these EV's and lose money on them so they can sell the full-size V8 monsters and not pay a huge penalty. Stellantis didn't do that and now they are playing a serious game of catch-up.
Gee, why would altitude matter? Is there possibly some benefit of compressing air, vs just sucking it into the engine, that has measurable benefits at altitude?But only if they're all dyno'd on the same dyno at altitude
And same ambient temperature, same air pressure, same tires, same tire wear, same gearing, same oil temperature, same transmission temperature, same transfer case temperature, same ....But only if they're all dyno'd on the same dyno at altitude
The 1968 327 corvette had 300hp, weighed half as much as the JLU, and did 0-60 in 7.5s. These big girls are quick with their mediocre engines by comparison (that 8 speed auto is amazing at getting the most out of any engine you put in front of it).Jeep 3.6 vs 2.0
![]()
Gee, why would altitude matter? Is there possibly some benefit of compressing air, vs just sucking it into the engine, that has measurable benefits at altitude?
That 300 HP was measured differently (SAE gross). In 1972 they made manufacturers measure the engine as installed (SAE net). That 300 HP turned into a more realistic 180 overnight.The 1968 327 corvette had 300hp, weighed half as much as the JLU, and did 0-60 in 7.5s. These big girls are quick with their mediocre engines by comparison (that 8 speed auto is amazing at getting the most out of any engine you put in front of it).
Or "why can't those fuckin assholes pick up their trash"?or fuckin assholes as in
"Why are those fuckin assholes not on the trail"
Nah, this here is PENTASTAR STUFF