It's set a hair to the performance side, but not enough to matter. You'll be good to go with this.Would you call this good?
If you don't mind elaborating on this, I'd be very interested in learning something new. I've replaced damaged diff parts in commercial vehicles, but was never in the performance sector of mechanics.It's set a hair to the performance side, but not enough to matter. You'll be good to go with this.
Edited to remove the ratio and rpm references. Added picture of a performance pattern from a standard pattern chart:If you don't mind elaborating on this, I'd be very interested in learning something new. I've replaced damaged diff parts in commercial vehicles, but was never in the performance sector of mechanics.
Thanks buddy!
Awesome explanation that made for a spot on mental picture! Thanks a bunch! I've only ever set engagement depth via a dial indicator on the ring gear teeth. I had no idea that location benefits along the circumference was even a thing. Thanks again for the schooling!Any pattern set to the inside of the ring circumference (center of teeth) would effectively be a performance set up. The gear ratio is provided you have everything set perfect on zero. If youâre set inside of center, then you would make your ratio a hair smaller. Youâll end up at 4.85 or 4.86, for example. Also, under high levels of torque, the pinion is trying to unscrew itself from the housing. The torque applied is trying to do this, but the housing is much stronger, so the torque goes to move the tires instead. When you launch a drag car or equivalent high performance vehicle, this torque can distort the ring, pinion, and housing. This distortion under a performance setup would allow the pinion to move to the center of the ring teeth where itâs strongest and the ratio is the most accurate. All that metal in there doesnât just stay put under load. More load, more distortion. Any ring and pinion set more to the economy side (outside of center) would do well, but in a performance environment, the pinion would move further to outside of the ring. Higher risk of breaking the gear teeth. With all that said, none of these Jeeps produce that much power - normally, BUT when youâre in 4LO, that torque is absolutely distorting things. Thatâs why itâs best to have gears set up center or very slightly off from center.
Itâs not always about keeping gears from making noise. Itâs a matter of how you use the vehicle and load.
This is exactly why I started building my Jeep. Because of aftermarket support and people like you who are in the game of changing things around. Thanks for the explanation.Any pattern set to the inside of the ring circumference (center of teeth) would effectively be a performance set up. The gear ratio is provided you have everything set perfect on zero. If youâre set inside of center, then you would make your ratio a hair smaller. Youâll end up at 4.89 or 4.90, for example. Also, under high levels of torque, the pinion is trying to unscrew itself from the housing. The torque applied is trying to do this, but the housing is much stronger, so the torque goes to move the tires instead. When you launch a drag car or equivalent high performance vehicle, this torque can distort the ring, pinion, and housing. This distortion under a performance setup would allow the pinion to move to the center of the ring teeth where itâs strongest and the ratio is the most accurate. All that metal in there doesnât just stay put under load. More load, more distortion. Any ring and pinion set more to the economy side (outside of center) would do well, but in a performance environment, the pinion would move further to outside of the ring. Higher risk of breaking the gear teeth. With all that said, none of these Jeeps produce that much power - normally, BUT when youâre in 4LO, that torque is absolutely distorting things. Thatâs why itâs best to have gears set up center or very slightly off from center.
Itâs not always about keeping gears from making noise. Itâs a matter of how you use the vehicle and load.
I'm happy to help; they're all just big legos.This is exactly why I started building my Jeep. Because of aftermarket support and people like you who are in the game of changing things around. Thanks for the explanation.
This part doesn't sound quite right... If it was a CVT then I would agree, but a toothed gear is always going to be dictated by the number of teeth, regardless of their relative position. Moving the gears closer or further away isn't going to change the ratios between them.If youâre set inside of center, then you would make your ratio a hair smaller. Youâll end up at 4.89 or 4.90, for example.
Yes, you are correct. I was just trying to paint a picture.This part doesn't sound quite right... If it was a CVT then I would agree, but a toothed gear is always going to be dictated by the number of teeth, regardless of their relative position. Moving the gears closer or further away isn't going to change the ratios between them.
It's really the other way around.This part doesn't sound quite right... If it was a CVT then I would agree, but a toothed gear is always going to be dictated by the number of teeth, regardless of their relative position. Moving the gears closer or further away isn't going to change the ratios between them.
Yes⌠if youâre anywhere off of center of the ring gear, it will change. I wasnât going to go any deeper on this because the pinion really should be set on zero, give or take, and it gets into a calculus problem in order to explain it further out side of center on the ring gear. For all intents and purposes, a properly set ring and pinion, should be as close to zero as possible for these Jeeps. What youâre saying is pinion depth changes backlash and thatâs about as simple as one can make it without sounding too nerdy. Lol.It's really the other way around.
The number of teeth on the two gears, along with a fixed diameter ring gear, determines the diameter of the pinion head.
We would be good friends. LolI like turtles