What I am referring to is even with the $12k incentives. the total lease payment plus the residual is about the same as the car price if you buy it outright. Which mean the leasing company is charging you $12K extra for the 3 years of lease.Nope, wrong on option 1. Purchase price at end of lease is the residual, which doesn't change based on discounts. Incentives are applied to capitalized cost, at least with CCAP.
They're click-chasing bullshitters, devoutly to be ignored.The only ”evidence” that there is a problem is the click bait YouTubers saying “automakers are screwed!!!”
Mm. For all of the hollering about the 4xe being the "best selling PHEV", would that remain true if the public assistance schemes, and tax accounting angle, were withdrawn wholesale?...the ONLY way that 4xe is still selling in the numbers it's selling is the massive amount of federal, state, factory and dealer incentives that it's eligible for. Also do not forget that the 4xe weighs more that 6,000lbs, which makes is eligible for accelerated depreciation under Article 179
Also, the border is secureDon't worry, it'll be transitory. (it won't)
![]()
Maybe not. But since all PHEV get similar assistance schemes etc. if all of that were stripped away from everything, who knows what would be #1.Mm. For all of the hollering about the 4xe being the "best selling PHEV", would that remain true if the public assistance schemes, and tax accounting angle, were withdrawn wholesale?
Were the taxpayer subsidies stripped away, I'd wager that the PHEV with the lowest cost of entry would occupy the #1 spot.Maybe not. But since all PHEV get similar assistance schemes etc. if all of that were stripped away from everything, who knows what would be #1.
Nope. These incentives simply lower the selling price (i.e. the CAP cost) of the vehicle. In case of a lease, the bank captures these incentives and therefore lowers the cap cost of the vehicle that you lease by the amount of these incentives. In case of a loan, you buy the vehicle for whatever price you can negotiate with the dealer and THEN receive all the government incentives yourself (usually in a form of income tax credit), thus lowering your overall payout.What I am referring to is even with the $12k incentives. the total lease payment plus the residual is about the same as the car price if you buy it outright. Which mean the leasing company is charging you $12K extra for the 3 years of lease.
I had that typed outWere the taxpayer subsidies stripped away, I'd wager that the PHEV with the lowest cost of entry would occupy the #1 spot.
Subsidized PHEVs have been around for a long time, no one wanted them, people want the Wrangler.They're click-chasing bullshitters, devoutly to be ignored.
Mm. For all of the hollering about the 4xe being the "best selling PHEV", would that remain true if the public assistance schemes, and tax accounting angle, were withdrawn wholesale?
$30k can't get any cheeeeper than that.Why? Jeeps are meant to appeal to everyone and be available to everyone. Putting them at that high of a price point puts Wranglers out of reach for a lot of people.
You keep saying stuff, but you have no idea what you're talking about.As for Federal tax credits, Wrangler 4xe only qualified for $3750 if you purchased it, but $7500 if you lease it. If you lease it, the leasing company captures the full $7500 and applies to your lease calculations.
If a dealer gave you full $7500 federal tax credit this year when you purchase a 4xe, which happened for some dealer to make a sale, you will owe $3750 tax when you file 2024 tax. Also if you are not qualified for the federal tax credit due to whatever reason, you have to pay back the full $7500.
I remember when people referred to money as bread. Those were the good old days… filled with swell things and good looking broads… ??I remember when bread was a nickel ?