- First Name
- Steve
- Joined
- May 29, 2018
- Threads
- 94
- Messages
- 5,214
- Reaction score
- 9,111
- Location
- Banned Camp
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 JLU
- Occupation
- jabroni
- Banned
- #31
Sponsored
yeah - I wasn’t thrilled when I saw that when I looked it up… I gave them plenty of documentation as part of my attempts to get @JeepCares to actually help. I really wanted to make that Jeep work for me, and in retrospect I hit my head against the wall too much. I should’ve lemoned it as soon as I could, while I tried for months to get them to fix it.Wow, you're right nothing on the history except 'lemon.'
The 3.6 in my 2021 JL is much different (better) than the 3.6 in my 2013 JK. Hope that helps.Yes, but my engine preference is
1. diesel
2. 2.0
3. 3.6
And currently I can't get diesel or 2.0 with xr package. May go with 3.6 as it isn't bad. I just wouldn't mind trying the other 2 as I didn't find the 3.6 impressive in my 2016. But I didn't have issues either.
is it the engine or the transmission? I have had 5 3.6's 4 jk's and now my JL and I think it is the transmission that makes the difference altho I was happy with the old NAG1.The 3.6 in my 2021 JL is much different (better) than the 3.6 in my 2013 JK. Hope that helps.
The dealer is lying.I searched and I couldn't find much info. I have been researching jeeps - I had a jk 2016-2019 that I enjoyed and ready to have another one.
The best 'deal' I can find is a 23 rubicon with 7,000 miles. It is a 'buyback'. Obviously, someone had enough issues Jeep purchased it back. Warranty is remaining 3/36,000. Dealer says no issues now and unsure what issues were.
Anyone have experience purchasing a 'buyback'? Should I avoid or consider?
Thanks
But did they specify what kind of Wrangler Could be a 4Xe and then you go into battery issuesI mean its a Wrangler it cant be that much more of a headache than the rest of them
The law in Utah requires that the seller disclose the "nonconformities" in writing in language specified here. Lemon Law (utah.gov) Furthermore, the Utah law requires all subsequent sellers to disclose the nonconformities.Sometimes its something as simple as a microchip. We all remember the shortage after the Chinese flu. OEM's bought back thousands of vehicles for this. I agree, check the service report and see what the issues were.
The resale value on these is substantially lower.I searched and I couldn't find much info. I have been researching jeeps - I had a jk 2016-2019 that I enjoyed and ready to have another one.
The best 'deal' I can find is a 23 rubicon with 7,000 miles. It is a 'buyback'. Obviously, someone had enough issues Jeep purchased it back. Warranty is remaining 3/36,000. Dealer says no issues now and unsure what issues were.
Anyone have experience purchasing a 'buyback'? Should I avoid or consider?
Thanks
This ^^^^. They know, because if it was a buyback, the dealer has been told by corporate why, or they were the dealer where it was bought back and they have a history.Hopefully you realize that that's a flat out lie if he implied that he couldn't find those details.
I looked into these when considering my purchase. Apparently most of them come from California because their lemon law is so strict that is forces buybacks when parts are delayed too long. The dealer should be able to find out what was wrong with it (if they don't, then something is up). The ones I was looking at came with an extended warranty, but the biggest issue I had was the resale/trade-in value was going to be significantly lower.I searched and I couldn't find much info. I have been researching jeeps - I had a jk 2016-2019 that I enjoyed and ready to have another one.
The best 'deal' I can find is a 23 rubicon with 7,000 miles. It is a 'buyback'. Obviously, someone had enough issues Jeep purchased it back. Warranty is remaining 3/36,000. Dealer says no issues now and unsure what issues were.
Anyone have experience purchasing a 'buyback'? Should I avoid or consider?
Thanks