Ask Ratbert

[HighTide]

The new tracker explicitly prohibits using it for that.

Use of this tracking system is not permitted for any other purpose including, but not limited to data aggregation, publication, reverse engineering or any commercial purpose.

Sponsored

 

[Ratbert]

The new tracker explicitly prohibits using it for that.

Stating something doesn't necessarily make it true.

But, of course, there doesn't seem to be an easy way of bulk-collecting that data.

 

[bjm00se]

The new tracker explicitly prohibits using it for that.

"We found one, Bob, get the binoculars!"
"Found what?"
"Shhh, don't spook him...
"Anyway, they're incredibly rare in the wild."
"Found What? What's incredibly rare?"
"A user who actually reads those terms-of-service disclaimers...
"And get me the camera."


?
(all intended in good fun)

 

[bjm00se]

Here it is for today. I'll run it again tomorrow.

month	# sequence numbers	# build sheets	% w/build sheets	# domestic build sheets	# domestic window stickers	% domestic in progress
Oct 2021	12,401​	11,745​	94.7​	10,265​	10,027​	2.3​
Nov 2021	13,100​	11,833​	90.3​	10,672​	10,485​	1.8​
Dec 2021	32,584​	29,158​	89.5​	19,484​	19,265​	1.1​
Jan 2022	30,743​	24,947​	81.1​	17,740​	17,457​	1.6​
Feb 2022	24,977​	15,569​	62.3​	10,883​	10,409​	4.4​
Mar 2022	22,570​	6,225​	27.6​	4,987​	4,179​	16.2​
Apr 2022	29,801​	2,774​	9.3​	2,694​	2,107​	21.8​
May 2022	​	4​	​	4​	0​	100.0​

Hi John, it's been two more weeks. Can you run this query again please?

 

[HighTide]

I'm not here to narc, just making sure Ratbert doesn't get calls from Stellanis attorneys

 

[Ratbert]

I'm not here to narc, just making sure Ratbert doesn't get calls from Stellanis attorneys

Understood. It, however, would be an awesome source of information if there was a way to scrape it. And, of course, to have lawyers ($$$$$) to verify that their claims have no standing.

 

[HighTide]

Understood. It, however, would be an awesome source of information if there was a way to scrape it. And, of course, to have lawyers ($$$$$) to verify that their claims have no standing.

No doubt

 

[Ratbert]

Hi John, it's been two more weeks. Can you run this query again please?

Thanks for reminding me.

Edit: deleted table since it was derived from an incomplete database.

 

[bjm00se]

Thanks for reminding me.

month	# sequence numbers	# build sheets	% w/build sheets	# domestic build sheets	# domestic window stickers	# domestic in progress
Oct 2021	12,145​	11,545​	95.1​	10,094​	10,058​	36​
Nov 2021	12,725​	11,727​	92.2​	10,563​	10,425​	138​
Dec 2021	32,959​	29,877​	90.6​	20,145​	19,944​	201​
Jan 2022	30,743​	25,650​	83.4​	18,201​	17,934​	267​
Feb 2022	24,977​	16,721​	66.9​	11,750​	11,333​	417​
Mar 2022	22,570​	8,598​	38.1​	6,736​	5,837​	899​
Apr 2022	29,779​	5,706​	19.2​	5,065​	4,181​	884​
May 2022	​	53​	​	48​	35​	13​

Something's weird. Oct and Nov actually show *fewer* build sheets in this run than they did two weeks ago.
FCA is unbuilding Jeeps. ;-)

EDIT: And March/April where we'd expect a *HUGE* uptake in build sheets, only show progress of a couple thousand.

Either there's a data anomaly, or the rate of Jeep building has slowed to a crawl.

 

[Ratbert]

Something's weird. Oct and Nov actually show *fewer* build sheets in this run than they did two weeks ago.

FCA is unbuilding Jeeps. ;-)

Sorry, I should have mentioned that I've excluded the first 255 sequence numbers from that analysis. Those seem to be some form of test run that never received window stickers, so they were skewing the results.

 

[Ratbert]

Something's weird. Oct and Nov actually show *fewer* build sheets in this run than they did two weeks ago.
FCA is unbuilding Jeeps. ;-)

EDIT: And March/April where we'd expect a *HUGE* uptake in build sheets, only show progress of a couple thousand.

Either there's a data anomaly, or the rate of Jeep building has slowed to a crawl.

I kept trying to figure out what was wrong, then I finally realized that when I refactored everything to start populating 2023s (and supporting other FCA products) on the extract side that I neglected to point the analysis side to the new database. Damn. Good catch!

month	# sequence numbers	# build sheets	% w/build sheets	# domestic build sheets	# domestic window stickers	# domestic in progress
Oct 2021	12,145​	11,547​	95.1​	10,096​	10,072​	24​
Nov 2021	12,725​	11,757​	92.4​	10,593​	10,488​	105​
Dec 2021	32,959​	29,979​	91.0​	20,216​	20,042​	174​
Jan 2022	30,743​	25,884​	84.2​	18,355​	18,094​	261​
Feb 2022	24,977​	17,160​	68.7​	12,035​	11,625​	410​
Mar 2022	22,570​	9,804​	43.4​	7,638​	6,721​	917​
Apr 2022	29,779​	7,370​	24.7​	6,271​	5,224​	1,047​
May 2022	​	81​	​	75​	54​	21​

 

[Oskaloosa Mailman]

Either there's a data anomaly, or the rate of Jeep building has slowed to a crawl.

I feel like production has stopped!

 

[bjm00se]

Sorry, I should have mentioned that I've excluded the first 255 sequence numbers from that analysis. Those seem to be some form of test run that never received window stickers, so they were skewing the results.

255 From October and also first 255 from November?
Or October only?

Both Oct and Nov show fewer build sheets, although Nov is only 76 fewer.

 

[Ratbert]

255 From October and also first 255 from November?
Or October only?

Both Oct and Nov show fewer build sheets, although Nov is only 76 fewer.

Just October. 100001 through 100256 seem to be bogus build sheets.

 

[bjm00se]

Just October. 100001 through 100256 seem to be bogus build sheets.

OK, I subtracted that out of Oct only. Nov still shows -76 negative build progress.

There's gonna be certain imprecision inherent in the system.

Sponsored