Being several hundred pounds heavier, the bronco needs the extra hp/tq. Simple power to weight ratio.
Agreed, but drag racing registerable off road vehicles is more like a comparison of which cordless drill could hammer a 6" long nail into that log. It's more playtime than consumer research.
Exactly! The only thing worse than driving a billboard into the wind, is a bigger billboard.
My personal take, when digging a tad deeper? The Jeeps #1 priority from the get go is the offroad, with on road drive ability as a close 2nd, so long as #2 doesn't encroach on #1. The Bronco is the polar opposite, which again in my opinion, was a smart move on Fords part. Rather than risk it all by going toe to toe, they simply filled a gap that jeep has always avoided. A large enough gap in the marketplace, of those that want the Rugged look, but a docile and familiar daily commute.
I just go with the 2 front doors off because of my daughter in the back. I don't care what it looks like, it's just fun to drive with the doors off.
I was sold on the 3.6 for it’s history of durability and it being a very common motor. I don’t recall checking the 0-60 times before buying. My Jeep is pretty slow compared to our Golf R, so I don’t really take much consideration of it being slightly faster than a Bronco. It’s still a slow vehicle, but kicks ass off-road and is still pretty fun elsewhere.
Problem.
For merely $4K you can have that look on your new JLU order LOL (dual door group)Not my Jeep and not a JL(obviously) but I like this look. Looks like a little truck
in my opinion? Yes, it’s completely pointless. I could care less that my jeep is faster or slower than some other vehicle. If I wanted a drag racer, I’d buy one.
Good point!
