flyer92
Well-Known Member
Seems like we both have similar backgrounds and I mostly agree with your statements. However, the $1000 theft limit was clearly thought through by many perpetrators in CA, as manifested by numerous ongoing thefts that were intentionally below the limit. Interestingly, many were pre-meditated and calculated down to the penny, resulting in thefts totaling $999.Having dealt with folks that commit violent crimes for a good part of my working life I can tell you the number that weigh the long term consequences of their actions enough to think about $1000 theft limits, or three strikes laws, etc are approaching 0%. Most aren’t thinking more than a few moments ahead of whatever they’re currently doing. For the most part, deterrence and rehabilitation are something we like to talk about to make ourselves feel better.
I respectfully disagree with your statement about deterrence though...especially from someone in law enforcement. Locking one's car doors and home entries, installing alarms, installing cameras, owning a dog, obtaining a CCW permit, etc., are all things that people do every day to deter crime. Assuredly, none of these things are 100% failsafe, but I'm 100% certain that these measures do more than just make folks feel better. Are you telling us that you never lock your home or car when unoccupied? Really?
Sponsored