Sponsored

How did you decide on your engine?

Headbarcode

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Threads
26
Messages
7,755
Reaction score
18,019
Location
LI, New York
Vehicle(s)
2019 JLUR Stingray 2.0 turbo
Vehicle Showcase
1
Driving up the mountains with the family loaded in, and 300 lbs of crap in the back reminded me just how bad that engine sucks wind. Completely gutless below 3000 RPM.

I drive a manual with 35s and 4.88 gears, but had to keep it in 4th for most of the drive up, and wind it out to maintain momentum.
The increased torque of the 2.0 vs 3.6 is also very obvious at sea level on long Island. I'm at over 4" of lift with 38x13.5's, and feel no immediate need for a regear. Still plenty of pep off the line and I see 8th all the time with the factory 4.10's.
Sponsored

 

nowandthen

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2017
Threads
12
Messages
382
Reaction score
462
Location
California
Vehicle(s)
2014 JKUR, 1989 Toyota standard cab pickup
The increased torque of the 2.0 vs 3.6 is also very obvious at sea level on long Island. I'm at over 4" of lift with 38x13.5's, and feel no immediate need for a regear. Still plenty of pep off the line and I see 8th all the time with the factory 4.10's.
That's impressive! Do you experience turbo lag?
 

XJfanatic

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Threads
36
Messages
984
Reaction score
2,217
Location
El Paso, Tx
Vehicle(s)
2020 JLU, 2020 JT, 2000 TJ
Build Thread
Link
Yes, a Pentastar inline 6 twin turbo has been rumored to be in development since 2018. The rumors say that the Pentastar 3.6 V6 did not respond well to turbo charging, and so they set out to develop an all new inline 6 twin turbo to eventually replace the 3.6 V6.

Whether or not we will ever see it in the Wrangler would be pure speculation. But if they do indeed release the motor, I don't see why not. The engine is rumored to be short enough to fit a wide variety of vehicles.

It was supposed to be released for 2022 or 2023. But we'll see.
They have been developing the 3.0 in-line six turbo for a long while now. It was rumored it would replace the 5.7. It follows the rationale that with .5 liters per cylinder you just need to extend the crank cam and block. It would probably fit but the last cylinder would be tucked into a revised firewall
 

TriumphJeepster

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jason
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Threads
14
Messages
817
Reaction score
1,475
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle(s)
2022 Wrangler Hopefully
I gotta say, after driving a 2.0 for the first time today (2018 4dr sahara) I was underwhelmed. Had 30k on it and was a dog unless I romped on it. I wonder if it wasn't running right?

I wanted to like it, now I am leaning back towards the 3.6 manual even with all the clutch issues ongoing. Sucks only getting those 2 in the 2 dr to choose from.
 

Sparty

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
945
Reaction score
3,173
Location
SW Michigan
Vehicle(s)
04 TJ, 21 JTR, 21 JLR
I gotta say, after driving a 2.0 for the first time today (2018 4dr sahara) I was underwhelmed. Had 30k on it and was a dog unless I romped on it. I wonder if it wasn't running right?

I wanted to like it, now I am leaning back towards the 3.6 manual even with all the clutch issues ongoing. Sucks only getting those 2 in the 2 dr to choose from.
I tried the 2.0 and had the exact same impression.

Went with the V6 and Manual. I thought all clutch issues were taken care of ?!?! :fingerscrossed:
 

Sponsored

multicam

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tanner
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Threads
8
Messages
1,924
Reaction score
5,532
Location
Alaska
Vehicle(s)
2018 4Runner, 2019 JLR
Vehicle Showcase
1
I tried the 2.0 and had the exact same impression.

Went with the V6 and Manual. I thought all clutch issues were taken care of ?!?! :fingerscrossed:
There’s an outstanding recall right now for 2018-2020(?) JL’s with the manual transmission that goes by the designation Y07. It isn’t ready to be implemented so dealers can’t install it yet. It’s supposedly a software fix that de-tunes the engine to reduce the load on the transmission.

Re: the inline 6... the Wagoneer forums seem to believe it’s going to be a future engine choice paired with a hybrid electric system (basically the Wagoneer’s 4xE equivalent).

The only thing that could get me out of my 3.6L with manual transmission is that inline 6 with a beefy manual from Tremec or something, or a 5.7L V8 also with manual transmission. Oh, and it has to have two doors. So yeah, this is my last jeep:CWL:
 

ChrisTheGod

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Mar 20, 2018
Threads
9
Messages
209
Reaction score
223
Location
New York-->Arizona
Vehicle(s)
Yamaha r6, Infiniti q60s conv, 2021 HYDRO RUBI
All I’m saying is I never heard a company give you something better for free so I’m banking in all those little baby engines bending around 80k
 

Saddle Tramp

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mitch
Joined
Jun 30, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
246
Reaction score
563
Location
Hays NC
Vehicle(s)
2021 Rubicon 3.0 Turbo Diesel
I think my choice was the only practical one I have made all my life. I just wanted something that could handle everything life on top of a mountain could throw at it. Washed out roads, snow, steep inclines on gravel roads. I sold 2 of my favorite vehicles and bought a Rubicon wit the 3.0 Diesel. Gave me every thing I wanted fresh out of the box. My first Jeep and my First Diesel.
So far I got everything I was looking for and am looking forward to a move to the mountains.
 

Headbarcode

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Aug 16, 2018
Threads
26
Messages
7,755
Reaction score
18,019
Location
LI, New York
Vehicle(s)
2019 JLUR Stingray 2.0 turbo
Vehicle Showcase
1
That's impressive! Do you experience turbo lag?
The eTorque did a pretty good job at disguising what little lag comes with a smaller turbo housing. Removing the factory programmed delay in throttle response, while also adding some sensitivity to it, really livened it up. I also added the Borla Touring Climber cat-back exhaust, which allows the motor to rev up a bit freer.
 

Sponsored

galleywinter

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tod
Joined
Dec 10, 2017
Threads
10
Messages
559
Reaction score
1,127
Location
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Vehicle(s)
2015 Hard Rock JKU, 2018 JL Rubi, 2020 Mercedes GLC 300(Wife) :-)
Occupation
Environmental Manager, VA Hospital
I chimed in a few weeks ago. It was easy for me. No upcharge for the 2.0 and I really have no preference between the 2 engines. Fast forward and some wack things went down at the factory and my build sat in "Paint stage" for 5 weeks then I'm told last week I have a new VON. Pretty much starting over. Holiday weekend, the plant is shut down next week for Summer break. No idea what my new VON is, if I have a VIN, etc... but it's safe to say after 10 weeks since my initial order they won't be starting on newest build any time soon. Pissed but blessing in disguise. I can now add the Extreme Recon package. Totally worth the $4k. The etorque isn't worth an additional $1750 but the Recon package is worth the $4k :) But...... I'm reading this morning that if you want the Recon package it's either 3.6 or 392. Not available right now in 2.0. That changes things. You can look at it this way. If you want the ER package it's not an additional $4k, it's actually $5,750 including the $1,750 uncharge for 3.6. Prob not doing that.
 

Strommen95

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2019
Threads
10
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
3,573
Location
New York
Vehicle(s)
2019 Jeep Wrangler Sport S Unlimited
I gotta say, after driving a 2.0 for the first time today (2018 4dr sahara) I was underwhelmed. Had 30k on it and was a dog unless I romped on it. I wonder if it wasn't running right?
It's power and acceleration is greatly exaggerated. Just like how some 3.6s exaggerate turbo issues to justify their purchase, some 2.0ers do the same with power. It does take some getting used to with a turbo and would run better with premium(I assume a dealer is using 87.)
 

lowmpg

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Apr 2, 2021
Threads
33
Messages
879
Reaction score
1,696
Location
Kent Island, Maryland
Vehicle(s)
2021 Rubicon, 2025 Ram Limited
Eh for better or worse I picked the 3.6 because I'd had turbos for 10 years and didn't feel like having to tune a motor to run a higher suspension, larger tires. Whether that makes sense or not, who knows :)
 

Wbino

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2021
Threads
116
Messages
4,271
Reaction score
7,625
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2021 Wrangler JL 3.6 Etorque -- 1999 SLK 230
Occupation
Retired
My tiny 2 seater is a 4 cyl turbo so I wanted my Jeep to be more manly....?
 

Rodeoflyer

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bert
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Threads
43
Messages
1,946
Reaction score
1,509
Location
Conifer, Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2020 Jeep JLUR; 2016 Ram Powerwagon
Vehicle Showcase
1
Driving up the mountains with the family loaded in, and 300 lbs of crap in the back reminded me just how bad that engine sucks wind. Completely gutless below 3000 RPM.

I drive a manual with 35s and 4.88 gears, but had to keep it in 4th for most of the drive up, and wind it out to maintain momentum.
I ran Imogene pass today from Ouray to Telluride for the 4th time with new 37'' ridge grappler tires (previously toyo mt 35''), stock 4.10 gears and the manual trans w/ about the same 300lbs of gear, myself at 200lbs and a 190lb codriver. Above 10k feet it does start to suck... HOWEVER downshifting and gratuitous use of 4lo took care of it. Evolve or die lol.

5.13 gears are def in order....
Sponsored

 
 







Top