yokramer
Well-Known Member
Its essentially a bot 20 questions. Just AI does all the questions where you cant see and makes stuff up.I don’t, and my adblocker says no to that, but I believe you.
Sponsored
Its essentially a bot 20 questions. Just AI does all the questions where you cant see and makes stuff up.I don’t, and my adblocker says no to that, but I believe you.
So kind of like this forum…I see nowIts essentially a bot 20 questions. Just AI does all the questions where you cant see and makes stuff up.
Like this nonsense below gleaned from ChatGPT with a cite from Reddit. (The 3.6 is obviously superior And this is chatbot BS)Its essentially a bot 20 questions. Just AI does all the questions where you cant see and makes stuff up.
Even blind squirrels find a nut occasionally.Like this nonsense below gleaned from ChatGPT with a cite from Reddit. (The 3.6 is obviously superior And this is chatbot BS)
Many owners note the 2.0 turbo delivers stronger low-end torque, great for passing and mid-range response: “2.0 has more lower end torque… The 2.0 L has more zip, no question about it.”
Yes. I should have clarified that I was referring to @jeepingib's statement:Doesn‘t ChatGPT use publicly available data which includes Reddit, Wikipedia, and even this forum? If so, won’t the most parroted misnomers be incorrectly weighted and have a greater chance of being repeated on ChatGPT? For example, make sure all your fuses are firmly seated, at one point, was the answer to every electrical problem on this forum.
It doesn't in any way imply that the aux is perfectly fine.By reading them you would think that they are perfectly fine, and no issues could be had by using them.
I'm guessing it also gave alternative perspectives as well, right? It's improved dramatically in recent years, especially with v5.Like this nonsense below gleaned from ChatGPT with a cite from Reddit. (The 3.6 is obviously superior And this is chatbot BS)
Many owners note the 2.0 turbo delivers stronger low-end torque, great for passing and mid-range response: “2.0 has more lower end torque… The 2.0 L has more zip, no question about it.”
I was referring to the A.I. summaries that were previously posted in this thread. You can get the A.I. bot to say pretty much anything you want to support your viewpoint. It's all in how you phrase the line of questions.Yes. I should have clarified that I was referring to @jeepingib's statement:
It doesn't in any way imply that the aux is perfectly fine.
It can be fun to see it get flustered if you ask it if it's hallucinating.Its essentially a bot 20 questions. Just AI does all the questions where you cant see and makes stuff up.
I need to go back and edit it to clarify that ChatGPT was summarizing that specific post and not the subject.I was referring to the A.I. summaries that were previously posted in this thread. You can get the A.I. bot to say pretty much anything you want to support your viewpoint. It's all in how you phrase the line of questions.
Same brother…same…no respect for their elders I tell you.I never used AI you guys. I don't even know how. I don't suspect I want to know either. With me you get Ol' one eye Willy.
I can't post gifs anymore, at times I can barely upload a photo. I'm getting worse everyday.
![]()
My understanding its a just combo of:I don’t understand the technology, but at this point it reminds me of the early stages of Wikipedia where anyone bored enough could contribute an article based fully on nonsense. Garbage in garbage out.
My thought is if someone posts the same erroneous info on this forum enough times it will get cited as a valid answer.My understanding its a just combo of:
Google search + cut/copy/paste= All wrapped up in one application.
So angry grilles don't cause cancer?My thought is if someone posts the same erroneous info on this forum enough times it will get cited as a valid answer.
Like for sure 100% the Gladiator is going to get the 392.My thought is if someone posts the same erroneous info on this forum enough times it will get cited as a valid answer.