azjl#3
Well-Known Member
Boom, no replacement for displacementOr which engine is better
Allow me to demonstrate.
![]()
But use a real big snorkel
Sponsored
Boom, no replacement for displacementOr which engine is better
Allow me to demonstrate.
![]()
Forced Induction is definitely a replacement for displacement. This isn’t 1979Boom, no replacement for displacement
But use a real big snorkel
Absolutely, 100% agree.@AnUnseenGod You have full access to the terminals and partial access to the battery. The harder thing is the fuse box, it's not going to open with it in place.
When I need to get in those spots, what I do is undo the front 10mm into the hood and then 4 torx up by the snorkel part, which is like 2 mins or less with a power driver and super simple.
Then the whole thing is somewhat flexible and you can lift or move it probably 6-8 or so inches. I'd rather un bolt those few very accessible pieces and move it around vs cutting the hood. I feel like it is a cleaner look too vs the big mopar one.
I also body color painted the black surround that attaches to the Jeep
1979 1979 good lord you must be young. BB’s were history except for trucks. The 79 350 Corvette got a 5HP bump to a whopping 225, and that’s up from the low point 165HP in 75 with a “performanceForced Induction is definitely a replacement for displacement. This isn’t 1979![]()
“ 205HP option. 560HP 427 available 67-69 (rated 430). The last 454 BB had 275 HP (73/4) jeeeez- thank god it isn’t 1979. I thought about that too, hes just a puppy.1979 1979 good lord you must be young. BB’s were history except for trucks. The 79 350 Corvette got a 5HP bump to a whopping 225, and that’s up from the low point 165HP in 75 with a “performance“ 205HP option. 560HP 427 available 67-69 (rated 430). The last 454 BB had 275 HP (73/4) jeeeez- thank god it isn’t 1979.
![]()
If snorkels were completely invisible, I'd wager there'd be a net increase in the customer base.I can't help but wonder - if snorkels were completely invisible, to what extent would their current customer base still purchase them?
Maybe a lot of us have invisible snorkels and just don’t know it. Like a Mopar snorkel of invisibility.If snorkels were completely invisible, I'd wager there'd be a net increase in the customer base.
What the heck is going on there.....Maybe a lot of us have invisible snorkels and just don’t know it. Like a Mopar snorkel of invisibility.
Im going to do dual snorkels and a dual exhaust
![]()
1979 1979 good lord you must be young. BB’s were history except for trucks. The 79 350 Corvette got a 5HP bump to a whopping 225, and that’s up from the low point 165HP in 75 with a “performance“ 205HP option. 560HP 427 available 67-69 (rated 430). The last 454 BB had 275 HP (73/4) jeeeez- thank god it isn’t 1979.
But it isn’t 1971 anymore is acceptable.
![]()

I raced and embarrassed Muscle Cars like GTO’s and Road Runners (low tier BB’s) with my 63 Willys Jeep. My best was a BB Mustang-tunnel ram, traction bars, the whole schbang by a nose. Cost me a Muncie main shaft, dropping it on my hand and breaking it upon removal, both down for months. But I was
I remember my young and dumb days. I would traffic light race my 1986 Chrysler Lebaron 2.2 against Mustang 5.0's, and usually break even. Back when a 5.0 was a screaming 225 HP.
The Pentastar is 260
That wasn't my favorite year for the mustang and I could never get past the body style from 1994 - 2004. 2005 - 2010 they done good.
I remember my young and dumb days. I would traffic light race my 1986 Chrysler Lebaron 2.2 against Mustang 5.0's, and usually break even. Back when a 5.0 was a screaming 225 HP.
The Pentastar is 260
Boss 9- the pinnacle.Nothing like the 69 of course.
![]()