Sponsored

Anyone do Downpipes yet?

AnnDee4444

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
5,529
Reaction score
7,951
Location
‎
Vehicle(s)
'18 JLR 2.0
Their power gain claims seem a little unrealistic, especially the 9.2% torque increase. I'm not sure that would be possible without a tune.

"Up to +14 Horsepower and +24 Pounds Per Feet of Torque Gains"
 

DesertFox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2018
Threads
0
Messages
54
Reaction score
37
Location
Valley of the Sun
Vehicle(s)
2019 Jeep KL
Eliminating the cat will really free up the turbo, allowing more air through at the same boost level and a definite power increase. Other turbo vehicles see decent power gains. I can’t confirm the increase claimed above, but it would be much more than an intake or catback.
 

AnnDee4444

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
5,529
Reaction score
7,951
Location
‎
Vehicle(s)
'18 JLR 2.0
Eliminating the cat will really free up the turbo, allowing more air through at the same boost level and a definite power increase. Other turbo vehicles see decent power gains. I can’t confirm the increase claimed above, but it would be much more than an intake or catback.
This is the 3.6 section of the forum. No (factory) turbos here.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
Rogues Gambit

Rogues Gambit

Banned
Banned
Banned
First Name
Mike
Joined
May 2, 2018
Threads
43
Messages
2,362
Reaction score
4,024
Location
Jersey Shore
Vehicle(s)
'21 2dr Bronco Badlands, 2.3t Manual
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
The use of the word downpipes probably threw him off. When I hear downpipe I automatically think turbo.
Me too, except that's what they call them there, hence why I called them that was I forgot the name and just went with it

We'll see what it offers, just wondering how it sounds if someone installed it yet is all
 

LateBraking

Well-Known Member
First Name
Y'all a cult.
Joined
Apr 17, 2019
Threads
7
Messages
92
Reaction score
56
Location
Illuminati Headquarters
Vehicle(s)
2018 Jeep Wrangler JL Rubicon
Depends on how much "cat" is in that cat. I remember the old E92 BMW M3 picked up a ton of power for a naturally aspirated motor. That said, the car had not one, not two, but FOUR catalytic converters to make it emissions-compliant. That was 1,200 cell count worth of flow restriction in that exhaust system. Uncorking it entirely (no cats) saw a notable increase in power gains.

I'm not sure I believe +24 ft. lbs of tq. gain at the wheels going from two stock cats to two high flow cats, but if they are accounting for drivetrain losses, then the figures are believable. That, or if the stock cats on the JL are extremely restrictive.

More importantly, do they throw codes that can only be resolved with a tune? Most high flow cats nowadays do, due to the complexity of OEM exhaust monitoring systems.

Notice a difference, hows it sound, worth it?
For sound I'd just go with a properly designed intake. Properly designed meaning in a completely sealed box to preserve water fording capability and repel ambient heat from the engine getting sucked into the intake. K&N, aFe, and S&B all make one. My choice was S&B because it is a sealed airbox unit that takes in air where the OEM airbox takes in air, but unlike K&N it uses a dry filter meaning no fouling of the intake sensor due to oil build-up, and unlike both K&N and aFe it is CARB-certified with an E.O. and is therefore 50-states legal. You won't really make any "noticeable" power with an intake (probably 2 or 3 horses max, nothing you'd ever feel) but it makes a fun noise, and fun is why we have these cars.
 
Last edited:

Andrew05LJR

Well-Known Member
First Name
Andrew
Joined
Feb 28, 2019
Threads
6
Messages
209
Reaction score
226
Location
Ft Lauderdale
Vehicle(s)
2019 JLUR
Depends on how much "cat" is in that cat. I remember the old E92 BMW M3 picked up a ton of power for a naturally aspirated motor. That said, the car had not one, not two, but FOUR catalytic converters to make it emissions-compliant. That was 1,200 cell count worth of flow restriction in that exhaust system. Uncorking it entirely (no cats) saw a notable increase in power gains.

I'm not sure I believe +24 ft. lbs of tq. gain at the wheels going from two stock cats to two high flow cats, but if they are accounting for drivetrain losses, then the figures are believable. That, or if the stock cats on the JL are extremely restrictive.

More importantly, do they throw codes that can only be resolved with a tune? Most high flow cats nowadays do, due to the complexity of OEM exhaust monitoring systems.



For sound I'd just go with a properly designed intake. Properly designed meaning in a completely sealed box to preserve water fording capability and repel ambient heat from the engine getting sucked into the intake. K&N, aFe, and S&B all make one. My choice was S&B because it is a sealed airbox unit that takes in air where the OEM airbox takes in air, but unlike K&N it uses a dry filter meaning no fouling of the intake sensor due to oil build-up, and unlike both K&N and aFe it is CARB-certified with an E.O. and is therefore 50-states legal. You won't really make any "noticeable" power with an intake (probably 2 or 3 horses max, nothing you'd ever feel) but it makes a fun noise, and fun is why we have these cars.
My E90 M3 woke the f up after primary cat delete and tune! But that’s a completely different animal than the 3.6. I’d like to think it’d gain a bunch but the tune is really where it made a difference in my E90
Sponsored

 
 







Top