AndySpill
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Andy
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2023
- Threads
- 71
- Messages
- 1,656
- Reaction score
- 1,271
- Location
- Pittsburgh
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 JL Sahara
- Thread starter
- #1
A couple of recent posts on subject matter than touches upon the following really got me thinking about how, in my opinion, Stellantis dropped the ball on its dual AGM battery JL offerings.
Given the position, size, and relative difficulty, or at least awkwardness of changing out the Aux battery, there is no way that anyone is going to tell me that its placement in the vehicle was anything other than an afterthought: the opposite of considered design.
Although the true motivation for its appearance in such JLs can be debated, some arguing the need for many an owner to run aftermarket power hungry appliances during ESS events (perhaps unique to Wranglers and Broncos) that could rob a single battery of cranking power when the ESS event ends, what can't be debated is that the entertainment system Stellantis chose to equip its JLs with is voltage sensitive...too sensitive if you ask me. Stories of people running the ESS system on just the main battery seem to confirm that.
It would appear to me, given that plenty of other manufacturer's are running their ESS systems with one battery that Stellantis, when it discovered this problem should have sought out a more robust entertainment system, not introduce a solution (the Aux battery) to this voltage drop issue likely to cause at least as many problems as it solves. You don't position a component like this Aux battery, likely given its small size and need to be changed frequently, in such an out of the way place where its recommended procedure for replacement actually suggests that you break and replace vehicle components to get to it (fender pins.) And you don't put dissimilar size batteries, even of the same battery chemistry, in parallel.
That the aftermarket will devise better approaches (witness Genesis Offroad) is not a justification for a slipshod build.
Given the position, size, and relative difficulty, or at least awkwardness of changing out the Aux battery, there is no way that anyone is going to tell me that its placement in the vehicle was anything other than an afterthought: the opposite of considered design.
Although the true motivation for its appearance in such JLs can be debated, some arguing the need for many an owner to run aftermarket power hungry appliances during ESS events (perhaps unique to Wranglers and Broncos) that could rob a single battery of cranking power when the ESS event ends, what can't be debated is that the entertainment system Stellantis chose to equip its JLs with is voltage sensitive...too sensitive if you ask me. Stories of people running the ESS system on just the main battery seem to confirm that.
It would appear to me, given that plenty of other manufacturer's are running their ESS systems with one battery that Stellantis, when it discovered this problem should have sought out a more robust entertainment system, not introduce a solution (the Aux battery) to this voltage drop issue likely to cause at least as many problems as it solves. You don't position a component like this Aux battery, likely given its small size and need to be changed frequently, in such an out of the way place where its recommended procedure for replacement actually suggests that you break and replace vehicle components to get to it (fender pins.) And you don't put dissimilar size batteries, even of the same battery chemistry, in parallel.
That the aftermarket will devise better approaches (witness Genesis Offroad) is not a justification for a slipshod build.
Sponsored