- First Name
- Howard
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2019
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 619
- Reaction score
- 584
- Location
- Palm Springs
- Vehicle(s)
- 2020 JLUAD
- Banned
- #166
It's already been done and it's not entirely effective. The engineered functional hood for the diesel once again is found in the European models different than the fake Rubicon Hood. It's not the final solution just an affordable partial solution. Think about it it would be cheaper for FCA to put the same hood on all the Diesels but our big brother here in the states always has their opinion on what's best. And that's not for the consumer, that's for their narrative. Don't be mad at Jeep or FCA. Look to your own country, that is constantly deciding what's best for you or what you need. We're in a day and age when it's no longer what works or what is best. It's what you will accept and what is given. Vote right and demand more or roll over and say Baah.I think about this when I consider altering the faux hood vents on the Rubicon hood to be functional heat extractors. The hood on my Hellcat Challenger had functional heat extractors in nearly the exact same positioning and the only downside to having those there were a couple of water spots for me to clean up when polishing the engine bay.
I think I'll probably alter the hood vents to make them functional as heat extractors as one of the initial measures to combat the overheating, if I find that I'm getting into that danger-range fairly often. I think the voiced concerns that it will damage the engine or electronics by getting wet is largely blown out of proportion. Sure there is some additional risk, but I think it is minor for the potential upside. Just a theory I'll likely test out one day. Maybe there is a way to trim the inner plastic in a way that routes the water stream away from any electrical connections on the top of the motor or something.
Sponsored

