2nd 392
Well-Known Member
That should have dawned on this Harley guy.A little funny business with the VIN can solve that.
it’s called “creative” not “funny business” Sponsored
That should have dawned on this Harley guy.A little funny business with the VIN can solve that.
it’s called “creative” not “funny business” As long as you laugh while you scrape the plate, you’re good.That should have dawned on this Harley guy.it’s called “creative” not “funny business”
![]()
Ca would probably give you life at hard labor they are so anal about emissions… When the smog laws were changed from year of engine to year of vehicle, but had a grandfather clause for those already done it took “creative writing” backdating on a sales receipt for the pre smog numbered L-79’s short block from my Jeep to get it registered in a friend’s gutless 75 Chevy PU. Well over twice the HP with a 50% Mpg gain from 8 to 12. I got the bow tie block he couldn’t use, and got stupid with a full 6-71 blown build.I’m not even sure if it would be illegal in any way, you’d have to register it as the 392 with a salvage/rebuilt title. It shouldn’t matter from there.
Sort of a philosophical here question but when fabricating a frankenstein vehicle with components from multiple vehicles, what donor vehicle's VIN would ultimately apply to the final product?A little funny business with the VIN can solve that.
I would use the one for the mechanicals for compliance reasons. Just like kit cars when you put a “Cobra” etc body, built using a donor “Mustang” rolling chassis, or others, down to a simple VW “dune buggy” and other bodies for them.Sort of a philosophical here question but when fabricating a frankenstein vehicle with components from multiple vehicles, what donor vehicle's VIN would ultimately apply to the final product?
Someone on this thread cited a Gladiator body on a Ram Cummins frame+mechanicals. Would VIN be the Ram or the Gladiator, for example.
The one you can convince a government employee to accept.Sort of a philosophical here question but when fabricating a frankenstein vehicle with components from multiple vehicles, what donor vehicle's VIN would ultimately apply to the final product?
Someone on this thread cited a Gladiator body on a Ram Cummins frame+mechanicals. Would VIN be the Ram or the Gladiator, for example.
Those M57 and that line are sexxxxy. I may be mistaken, but isn't that the engine line that Diamond used in their airplanes before they started doing them in-house as whoever the first company was and then Austro engine?Cummins still makes a turn key 2.8L. It is way down on power compared to the Ecodiesel, but that is due to the emissions tuning since it goes through a more stringent engine dyno certification and not a chassis dyno certification like complete vehicles do.
https://www.cummins.com/engines/repower
If I were to ever swap anything into my JL, I would put a BMW M57 3.0L inline-6 turbo diesel engine. Those things are bullet proof even at high horsepower and already mate up to the ZF 8-speed transmission. I have seen them at over 500 rwhp with stock internals.
Unkillable Diesels: BMW’s M57 I-6 | DrivingLine
I want an aerospace furnace in my TearDrop Trailer!yup sure do, rebuild cars as a hobby. i also design and build aerospace furnaces for a living. Cars and trucks are easy
A 6.7 is no bigger on the outside. a cummins engine is probably not much more than an ecodiesel either.If you have to ask, triple the price.
No, it’s totally unreasonable. It’s like suggesting a hellcat drop in replacement for a 3.6. It’s going to be very, very expensive, and lots of things are going to have to be modified or outright removed.
It has been said a 5.9 Cummins can technically fit, a 6.7 isn’t happening.