Sponsored

2nd 392

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jun 20, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
10,181
Reaction score
17,034
Location
Ca
Vehicle(s)
Grand Cherokee srt.V10 Dodge 4x
Winch wasn't standard on non-FE 392's
Jeep Wrangler JL 2026 Jeep Wrangler Model Info (including Moab 392 V8) - Official Stellantis PR 19FA1872-2924-403C-8EDB-0E1B057D5747

2025 WRANGLER 4–DOOR RUBICON 392
Estimated Net Price $102,585
•- Standard Features
PACKAGES & EQUIPMENT GROUPS
• Rubicon 392 Final Edition

but since B&P has been wrong before, show me where the FE isn’t 25 standard equipment and I’ll believe it.
 

Sponsored

wanderer

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ralph
Joined
Aug 10, 2017
Threads
258
Messages
1,978
Reaction score
1,084
Location
Carlsbad CA
Vehicle(s)
2018 jlu rubicon. Surfboard. Bare feet, moose drawn air sled, Interstellar time warp space transport fighter
Occupation
Engineering Geologist
does moab mean it will be outfitted without a front winck aka gladiator snd with a lift again a la gladiator?
 

AVGeek99

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
1,079
Reaction score
1,661
Location
Peyton, CO
Vehicle(s)
2025 JLUR '41, 2024 Rubicon 4xe (wife's) Bright White
Build Thread
Link
Yes. The MP3022. has a 2.72:1 ratio.
If I was in the market that is the one thing that would make me think twice about the 392. Obviously, the 392 has more than enough torque that it doesn't need 4:1 low range. But half the breauty of the 4:1 T-Case is the crawl ratio. I don't understand the 2.72 T-Case!
 

AVGeek99

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
1,079
Reaction score
1,661
Location
Peyton, CO
Vehicle(s)
2025 JLUR '41, 2024 Rubicon 4xe (wife's) Bright White
Build Thread
Link
"Final Edition" Rubicon is still a cheeky and misleading maneuver to make buyers believe 392s were going away for good. Only to bring it back as a Moab. Smart money grab, I'm sure it worked.
The first Final Edition came out when Tavares was running things. It wouldn't surprise me if it truly was initially intended to be the Final Edition.

But with Tavares gone, long live the 392!!
 

Sponsored

AVGeek99

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
1,079
Reaction score
1,661
Location
Peyton, CO
Vehicle(s)
2025 JLUR '41, 2024 Rubicon 4xe (wife's) Bright White
Build Thread
Link
What's the point of this? I don't even get what is different other than a sticker
Are you talking about the MOAB sticker on the hood or the sticker price? Becuase the sticker price sure is different than previous couple years. Still more than I'm willing to afford, but it's beginning to approach reasonable, at least compared to 24-24.
 

AVGeek99

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Aug 24, 2021
Threads
47
Messages
1,079
Reaction score
1,661
Location
Peyton, CO
Vehicle(s)
2025 JLUR '41, 2024 Rubicon 4xe (wife's) Bright White
Build Thread
Link
This is a real problem. If they do, bad decisions will ensue. I'm only 1.5 years into my '24 (2 door, manual, half doors). But dropping the price by $20k on the 392 and bringing Joose back (had a '13 in Crush) was not very nice of Jeep. I already messaged my boss.
I had a 2012 Crush, loved it. I tried to order a Joose back, in June but was told it was "no longer avaialbe for order". I ended up getting a `41 with everything I wanted and nothing I didn't for a huge discount. I like my `41, I'm sticking with it!
 

2nd 392

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jun 20, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
10,181
Reaction score
17,034
Location
Ca
Vehicle(s)
Grand Cherokee srt.V10 Dodge 4x
The first Final Edition came out when Tavares was running things. It wouldn't surprise me if it truly was initially intended to be the Final Edition.

But with Tavares gone, long live the 392!!
As the TRX Final Edition that was. But now appears being resurrected from extinction. The 392 Wrangler placed on the endangered species list by Tavares but has made a comeback since.
 
Last edited:
 







Top