GlowingGhoul
New Member
I find most people who like to point to the 'Top Safety Picks" on the IIHS ignore this disclaimer: *** "Larger, heavier vehicles generally afford more protection than smaller, lighter ones. Thus, a small car that's a Top Safety Pick+ or Top Safety Pick doesn't necessarily afford more protection than a bigger car that doesn't earn the award." I have no doubt that in a Wrangler / CR-V collision, the Wrangler will suffer far less damage than the CR-V, despite it's higher safety ratings, for that very reason. Ditto for a Wrangler vs almost any car-based SUV.Hear, hear. Look at Suburban/Yukon - if I have to choose an SUV to crash in, that’s the one I pick! In fact, let me crash my Yukon XL into any of your unibody Japanese “SUVs” and we’ll see who fares better.
I hate that 1980’s quality comparisons still have legs.
Sponsored
Last edited: