Sponsored

Tires VS Engine

Henrix123

Member
First Name
Henrix
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Threads
4
Messages
23
Reaction score
12
Location
Rogers, AR
Vehicle(s)
2019 JRU Sahara
Vehicle Showcase
1
2019 Sahara 2.0 & I've read through lots of threads regarding regearing when going to 35s. Not much talk on the additional torque of the 2.0 over the V6 as a factor of weather to re-gear or not. Has anyone driven both engines with 35s & stock gearing?

Not concerned with it being underpowered when wheeling since it's mainly a DD.
Sponsored

 

AnnDee4444

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
5,529
Reaction score
7,951
Location
‎
Vehicle(s)
'18 JLR 2.0
2019 Sahara 2.0 & I've read through lots of threads regarding regearing when going to 35s. Not much talk on the additional torque of the 2.0 over the V6 as a factor of weather to re-gear or not. Has anyone driven both engines with 35s & stock gearing?

Not concerned with it being underpowered when wheeling since it's mainly a DD.
I haven't driven both engines with 35s, but I can graph out the road force for each scenario. I think that because of the 2.0's lower redline and higher torque, there isn't as much of a need to re-gear (at least in Rubicons). The biggest issue seems to be the loss of a usable 8th gear (or 6th for the manual). For a good comparison, I calculated that the 3.6 Rubicon auto has about 382 pounds of road force at 75MPH. Both scenarios you have described are about 290-300 pounds at 75 MPH, which may not be enough to use 8th gear.

This graph below is with 35.0" tall tires with 1.1" of tire sag, 3.45 differential ratio, & 17% drivetrain loss.
Solid = 2.0
Dashed = 3.6
Jeep Wrangler JL Tires VS Engine Pounds of Road Force by Gear
 
OP
OP
Henrix123

Henrix123

Member
First Name
Henrix
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Threads
4
Messages
23
Reaction score
12
Location
Rogers, AR
Vehicle(s)
2019 JRU Sahara
Vehicle Showcase
1
I haven't driven both engines with 35s, but I can graph out the road force for each scenario. I think that because of the 2.0's lower redline and higher torque, there isn't as much of a need to re-gear (at least in Rubicons). The biggest issue seems to be the loss of a usable 8th gear (or 6th for the manual). For a good comparison, I calculated that the 3.6 Rubicon auto has about 382 pounds of road force at 75MPH. Both scenarios you have described are about 290-300 pounds at 75 MPH, which may not be enough to use 8th gear.

This graph below is with 35.0" tall tires with 1.1" of tire sag, 3.45 differential ratio, & 17% drivetrain loss.
Solid = 2.0
Dashed = 3.6
Pounds of Road Force by Gear.png
Not being familiar with the road force you referenced is the loss of 8th because of available power? Drivetrain rotating slower because of the larger tire?

Anyone personally experience the 2.0 spending more time in 6-7 on the HWY opposed to 7-8 as it would stock?
 

AnnDee4444

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
5,529
Reaction score
7,951
Location
‎
Vehicle(s)
'18 JLR 2.0
Not being familiar with the road force you referenced is the loss of 8th because of available power? Drivetrain rotating slower because of the larger tire?
The road force is can be thought of as the amount the tires are pushing against the roadway. It is a similar concept to axle torque, but with the tire height also taken into account.

The loss of 8th gear would be because with 3.45 gearing the torque in 8th gear at 75 mph would not be enough to overcome wind resistance, drive-train loss, etc. Going to a numerically higher gear ratio is one way to solve this, weather that means using 7th gear or a different axle ratio.
 

OnlyOne

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Feb 17, 2018
Threads
37
Messages
1,673
Reaction score
3,228
Location
Northwestern New Mexico
Vehicle(s)
2021 Sport S Diesel on 37s
I’ve owned both on 37s. I didn’t even feel the loss to be honest with you. With either motor and the auto. The Turbo just makes the drive more enjoyable and effortless on the highway. This is obviously on a Rubicon so your results with a Sahara will vary.
Sponsored

 
 







Top