jlaliberty
Well-Known Member
He's just promoting his own company...Town and Country? That guy is the most Bronco lovin Ford dealin guy on Youtube... there's no way he'd trash it, lol.
Sponsored
He's just promoting his own company...Town and Country? That guy is the most Bronco lovin Ford dealin guy on Youtube... there's no way he'd trash it, lol.
Maybe i read you wrong then. Also I've seen Broncos online do pretty big rock obstacles that I wouldn't do with either of my vehicles. It's just as capable. Just applies it differently.Go back and re-read. It wasnāt a comparison. I said that a Bronco can ride fast on rutted out roads my crosstrek could probably navigate. Youāre not going to do 60 down Pritchett Canyon in a Bronco, but you might fly down parts of long canyon (if you were alone and not worried about hitting someone in oncoming traffic).
Never did I write that Crosstrek and Bronco are equally capable, nor really even directly compare the two.
āTwas merely a way of saying that the type of 4wheeling that the Bronco appears built to excel at, just happens to not be the type that interests me. I donāt care to fly down a washboard road, I like to crawl obstacles. Bronco just isnāt going to be as capable at that as Wrangler (hence my choice of vehicle). I could afford both, but I donāt see a place for Bronco in my garage. Me personally, Iād get a 4Runner to do a Broncoās work. But I donāt have one of those either, nor do I plan to.
My wife thinks the 2dr Bronco is cute as a button though, and sheād buy one if it was proven reliable. So maybe thereās one in my future.
It was kind of a clickbait title too.He's just promoting his own company...
Sure. But almost anything can be modded to go almost anywhere. A Wrangler can be made to better compete with a Bronco on extremely rough roads by lowering air pressure. A Bronco canāt be made to compete better with a Wrangler on a tough rock crawl without extensive suspension mods. Though that may not necessarily be the case if Ford decides to re-engineer some stuff as factory equipment for future models. Only time will tell.Ok. But people are lifting them and putting them on 40s and keeping up with Jeeps. Moab, Rubicon, Windrock... they're doing it all, a lot even stock. I understand the SFA vs IFS argument... but if the Bronco can still conquer the obstacle, people might start having other things be the deciding factor... like infotainment, comfort, style...
Either way, people who own both are probably able to give pretty objective reviews, so I'm looking forward to what @JeepViking13 has to say after a while wheeling both =)
From a 4 door perspective, a lot of people are glossing over the fact that the Bronco has a 2" shorter wheelbase than the JLU. It can make a difference in some scenarios. I think the 2 doors are the opposite tho... Bronco is 2" longer.Maybe i read you wrong then. Also I've seen Broncos online do pretty big rock obstacles that I wouldn't do with either of my vehicles. It's just as capable. Just applies it differently.
I'm not going to get into a Jeep vs Bronco debate because I like both for different reasons. I will say the 2 door Bronco is definitely a different animal then the 4 door. With a wheelbase of 100 inches it's literally perfect. Not too long and not to short.
Ya sorry, I'm also not really helping on that one lol
Great post until it blew up in a flaming wreck at the end. Having owned a K5 Blazer that was the worst vehicle I've ever owned in 45 years of owning vehicles I'd take a hard pass on anything w/a K5 on the side. But hey, to each his ownTrue, but I think the Wrangler does bet
Sure. But almost anything can be modded to go almost anywhere. A Wrangler can be made to better compete with a Bronco on extremely rough roads by lowering air pressure. A Bronco canāt be made to compete better with a Wrangler on a tough rock crawl without extensive suspension mods. Though that may not necessarily be the case if Ford decides to re-engineer some stuff as factory equipment for future models. Only time will tell.
Both vehicles are capable as-is for probably 90+% of the market, but from what Iāve seen, Wrangler is the clear winner when it comes from a strictly off-road capable perspective. If your going for the soccer mom daily driver perspective, the winner isnāt as clear.
That being said, if GM brought back the K5 Blazer reminiscent of the square body of the 70ās through the 90ās, Iād dump my Rubicon in a flash and go buy one, especially if theyād ditch the leaf springs and go with coils.
Come on... you know that 6.2 liter NA Detroit Diesel is calling your name...Great post until it blew up in a flaming wreck at the end. Having owned a K5 Blazer that was the worst vehicle I've ever owned in 45 years of owning vehicles I'd take a hard pass on anything w/a K5 on the side. But hey, to each his own![]()
No doubt.No doubt. Its actually a dilemma I'm having with myself. Sell it and make the profit now. Or keep it and make YouTube content with both vehicles. It's also not easy to wait for a vehicle for over 2 years and then finally get it just to let it go. Especially something like the Bronco.
Aside from the frame cracking at the steering box and the hood folding in half at the hinges, I never had an issue with either of mine. ?Though I will say that Iāve had my Jeep on some trails that would be near impossible in a Blazer without body damage due to the extra width. Articulation with leaf spring suspension is also a limiting factor for hardcore stuff. Probably wouldnāt be an issue for what I typically do.Great post until it blew up in a flaming wreck at the end. Having owned a K5 Blazer that was the worst vehicle I've ever owned in 45 years of owning vehicles I'd take a hard pass on anything w/a K5 on the side. But hey, to each his own![]()
I canāt imagine what the hell they were thinking with that thing. A diesel without forced induction is like a Jeep with square headlights. ?Come on... you know that 6.2 liter NA Detroit Diesel is calling your name...