Rubi6mt
Well-Known Member
Cool. I too debated at nauseum AL vs steel. As I frequent trails with boulders higher then the frame I decided to go with the steel for longevity and ease to slide over (recognizing having UHMV layer renders this mute).Thanks! I forgot to update, Chris at Metalcloak said it was very minor, under an inch. Looks like it's pretty flush so probably under 1/2".
I'm leaning Al to save weight but really like the Metalcloak system. Plus I wouldn't have to mess with the gas tank to add the skid. I do wish they had an exhaust skid, and the muffler skid for the 392 protected the tips. Lot of debate on whether either of those matters, natch.
Happy 4th!
The other main reason for me to go with Metalcloak is the design is really well thought out with boat sided enldges and bolt mount guards as you can see in these pics
Also the weight disadvantage tbh is a non issue. I have a 3.6 6-speed and notice no change in every day driv8ng other then cornering a little flatter due to likely a slightly lower COG (and this coming from someone whose other car has a TTV8).
Regardless of what you choose, it will be heaps better then the silly stock skids that got me hung up on a particularly large rock and I had to winch off of it.
As for the exhaust, I went high tuck. Not sure of they offer similar for a 392?
Good luck and Happy 4th!
Sponsored