2nd 392
Well-Known Member
“ Buckle Up—Economy Standards Getting Tougher” (also emissions) Muscle Cars and Trucks. Long story short- want one of these Beasts? Do it NOW! They want new regs by March 2024 .
Sponsored
Last edited:
A V8 beat a V6??? Holy smokes! That HAS to be the first time that happened, right??Like there was any doubt, but a fun video nevertheless.
Well, a NA V8 vs a boosted V6 could be competitive (doesn’t the latest Ford GT run one) of course, boosting the V8 Just Might make it laughable! Edit-memory flash, during the classic muscle car era a friend had a blown big GMC 6 in a 55 Chevy, it was the definition of a sleeper.A V8 beat a V6??? Holy smokes! That HAS to be the first time that happened, right??
I'm not an electrician or plumber, or specify directly with HVAC but my trade as a service tech has all 3 components in it and oh man, looking at this engine bay is giving me anxiety. lmfaoFord engine bays are designed like a total mess on purpose, so it’s hard to see when the engines blow up...
True, but this isn't 1990 where displacement meant anything. That twin-turbo intercooled V6 failed miserably in out performing the ancient design of the 392 from 2011. Ford should have set beating that as a benchmark for their 80,000 ride.A V8 beat a V6??? Holy smokes! That HAS to be the first time that happened, right??
Hence my comment in the original postA V8 beat a V6??? Holy smokes! That HAS to be the first time that happened, right??
It looks like they threw away the Ikea directions and decided to go it alone.Ford engine bays are designed like a total mess on purpose, so it’s hard to see when the engines blow up...
They had 2 Broncos, wish they had added another Jeep; preferably, the 4xe with the turbo to help with altitude. It would be the heaviest vehicle, but not the slowest.Thought the 4Xe is quicker than the raptor bronco.