viper88
Well-Known Member
Or $65,000..Yup, sounds like a Jeep alright. Be glad you didn’t pay $50,000...!![]()
Sponsored
Or $65,000..Yup, sounds like a Jeep alright. Be glad you didn’t pay $50,000...!![]()
Might depend on engine but my 2.0 heats faster then anything I have ever owned. Same with the heated steering wheel and seats.I'm sorry you're having issues but honestly none of these are serious in any way. Climate controls not working is certainly annoying but I live in the northeast too and the heat alone is plenty after idling for 5 minutes. By far the best heat I've ever felt from any brand. You can spend 70k+ on a luxury vehicle and get "thieved" too. Fact is in the motor industry today almost all vehicle issues across all brands are related to electronics.
When I pay fuck-you prices, I want fuck-you service! lol!Wait cost is associated with reliability ?
Tell that to Range Rover owners... Since some seem to think that a 50k vehicle needs to be more reliable than a 25k vehicle. If anything its the other way around... what's going to have more issues... a 15k mitsubishi Mirage or a 400 Rolls Royce Wraith
Yea I'll def agree with you on this. My Jeep dealer experience they treat you like an annoyance and I usually have a very bad experience if I need anything done. On the other hand when I owned my BMW 335i coupe the dealer treated me like a king. I have never had such genuinely good service in my life, nothing to do with the car itself(still had issues) but how I was treated and how they cared it was like I was on a different planet.When I pay fuck-you prices, I want fuck-you service! lol!
It's natural and reasonable to expect better customer service and reliability when you pay more. It's human psyche. The difference is how the dealer and manufacturer treats the customer when there are problems. Trust me that... $400K Rolls customer is getting some "fuck you service" probably a triple portion. Lol. I think customers would be more accepting of problems and warranty work if customer service were better. I owned 3 MINIs. Everyone of them had issues. With the exception of my '97 TJ all 3 MINIs were the most unreliable cars I have ever owned. All had constant warranty issues. Why did I keep buying them? The dealer and MINI treated me right and did the right things whenever there was a problem. Another reason I kept buying them, like Wranglers, they were fun as hell to drive. lol. By the way, my '97 TJ was by far and away the most unreliable vehicle I have ever owned. It was also one of my most favorite. Talk about a Jeep Thing? LOL!
Indeed. Dealers are in a position to make any issue be minor or turn into a major problem.Reading this, I feel so old! You see, back in the day when you bought that new GM/Ford/Dodge - you expected to take it back in a week to get the dealership to fix, replace or find that damn rattle. The dealers knew this and expected it too. It was "normal"! Then, the mid-late 1970's hit and the big three started making real shit boxes and it got ugly. I saw my dad and his family start to lose faith and then it happened, somebody went and bought one of them fur-ernn cars. Shock! Then it was hey, this is actually pretty good, you haven't been back to the dealer? really? Hey Martha, want to go look at some Datsuns?
Now, I fully believe cars are better now than ever, could they be better? Sure! But, I think most of the problems are ones of suppliers sending bad radios/electronics - how do you know if there's a bad chip or board that has a fault that is waiting to show up? You don't, and when you're buying thousands, you're not testing every single one. More parts, more suppliers, more links of a chain that could fail.
But - dealers can do a better job taking care of customers for sure. And, customers can do a better job of being civil and not biting some poor service writer's head off, hell, he didn't build it! A little niceness goes a long way on both sides.
By the way, I'm old school, prefer Ruger GP100's over the latest plastic wonder nines. But, love me some heated seats in the Jeep!
The buck stops with FCA no matter who supplies the parts. It is up to FCA to insure parts quality by audits or engineering. It is a global business and all car companies all use the same suppliers to a certain extent. Every car manufacture sets quality standards for allowable defective parts. If one car company can do it FCA can if they are managed properly.Reading this, I feel so old! You see, back in the day when you bought that new GM/Ford/Dodge - you expected to take it back in a week to get the dealership to fix, replace or find that damn rattle. The dealers knew this and expected it too. It was "normal"! Then, the mid-late 1970's hit and the big three started making real shit boxes and it got ugly. I saw my dad and his family start to lose faith and then it happened, somebody went and bought one of them fur-ernn cars. Shock! Then it was hey, this is actually pretty good, you haven't been back to the dealer? really? Hey Martha, want to go look at some Datsuns?
Now, I fully believe cars are better now than ever, could they be better? Sure! But, I think most of the problems are ones of suppliers sending bad radios/electronics - how do you know if there's a bad chip or board that has a fault that is waiting to show up? You don't, and when you're buying thousands, you're not testing every single one. More parts, more suppliers, more links of a chain that could fail.
But - dealers can do a better job taking care of customers for sure. And, customers can do a better job of being civil and not biting some poor service writer's head off, hell, he didn't build it! A little niceness goes a long way on both sides.
By the way, I'm old school, prefer Ruger GP100's over the latest plastic wonder nines. But, love me some heated seats in the Jeep!
Totally true but FCA and management has to take blame. If other car companies can succeed FCA should be able to also.Indeed. Dealers are in a position to make any issue be minor or turn into a major problem.
And let’s not forget that automakers love to squeeze suppliers. No supplier produces 100% defect-free, but when suppliers get squeezed, the probability goes up that they will deliver a faulty head unit or a poorly welded frame.
There’s hope. Carlos Tavares, CEO of Peugeot, and who would be in charge of FCA if the merger goes through, is reported to be a big believer in quality.The bottom line is car companies will only continue doing what they are doing if consumers allow it. FCA has no incentive to change it's lack of customer service or below par quality control if consumers keep buying their products. The Wrangler is very unique, it's the only game in town, for now anyway. There are no other vehicle choices if you want a task specific, rock crawling, 4x4, with removable doors and roof, with a iconic look. Consumers simply buy them and hope for the best. Myself included. We lay down and take it. The uniqueness and fun of driving a Wrangler shines over the rare possibility of a quality issue. It's a Jeep Thing! lol.
The problem is Jeep and Ram are probably the only brands in the FCA family that are doing well. That's why there are talks about mergers.
Yeah, Peugeot was actually rated #1 in reliability in the UK. At the other end of the spectrum was FCA brands.There’s hope. Carlos Tavares, CEO of Peugeot, and who would be in charge of FCA if the merger goes through, is reported to be a big believer in quality.