- First Name
- Andy
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2019
- Threads
- 59
- Messages
- 1,657
- Reaction score
- 1,283
- Location
- SanFrancisco
- Vehicle(s)
- JL Wrangler
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #1
Clearly, we all have many different viewpoints on all the dimensions of ESS, including but certainly not limited to:
These have all been well covered here before. And I hope like me, you respect, if not agree with opinions differing from your own.
That said, my focus here is on my own personal curiosity with so many owners just hating the idea of pressing the ESS off button so much, that they'd spend on tech to do it for them. By no means am I criticizing those who make such purchases as we all have adversity to doing different things. I just find it curious how I don't hear, "dang, I wish that radio on button was latching. Why do I have to press it to turn on the radio I almost always want on?"
I suspect it has to do with the idea that we're willing to press buttons to enable the things we enjoy, or that were use to as a society to enable, even if we don't like them (e.g. having to tie our shoes if we choose lace based footwear) rather than buttons to disable the things we dislike. But to my way of thinking, I think in short order, habit could form where we press the starter button with our thumb, and the ESS button a second later after successfully cranking with, say, our pointer finger.
I also suspect that one would be hard pressed to find a community of people more interested in freedom than Wrangler owners. The vehicle's history in securing it during military conflict, and its ability to make trails of its own where few other vehicles can appeals to people so annoyed by government forcing an ESS feature they don't like in their vehicle, which they bought and paid for the gasoline to drive, that buying tech to forget its there is worth it to them.
What say you? Why does such tech to disable it sell as well as it does. Do you think a device to "tie your shoes," say, for example, would sell as well?
I will leave this OP with one opinion. I hope it doesn't start a firestorm because you don't have to agree with it. Here goes:
Technically, you are not paying the true price of gasoline. Assuming you buy into global warming, that gasoline's effect on our climate requires money to remedy. If included in the price of gasoline, which many argue would be fair, your fuel might be triple in cost, and an ESS you can turn off through multiple means is far less costly to remedy.
- Why government forces manufacturers to implement it in a non-latching (has to be turned off each time the rig cranks with a start button press without buying tech to do it) ways or face stiff penalties if fleet MPG ratings fail to meet certain thresholds
- Concern over how much it really saves as compared to vehicle wear and tear
- The design of the system and, at least on 3.6L JLs that dang ESS/Aux battery.
These have all been well covered here before. And I hope like me, you respect, if not agree with opinions differing from your own.
That said, my focus here is on my own personal curiosity with so many owners just hating the idea of pressing the ESS off button so much, that they'd spend on tech to do it for them. By no means am I criticizing those who make such purchases as we all have adversity to doing different things. I just find it curious how I don't hear, "dang, I wish that radio on button was latching. Why do I have to press it to turn on the radio I almost always want on?"
I suspect it has to do with the idea that we're willing to press buttons to enable the things we enjoy, or that were use to as a society to enable, even if we don't like them (e.g. having to tie our shoes if we choose lace based footwear) rather than buttons to disable the things we dislike. But to my way of thinking, I think in short order, habit could form where we press the starter button with our thumb, and the ESS button a second later after successfully cranking with, say, our pointer finger.
I also suspect that one would be hard pressed to find a community of people more interested in freedom than Wrangler owners. The vehicle's history in securing it during military conflict, and its ability to make trails of its own where few other vehicles can appeals to people so annoyed by government forcing an ESS feature they don't like in their vehicle, which they bought and paid for the gasoline to drive, that buying tech to forget its there is worth it to them.
What say you? Why does such tech to disable it sell as well as it does. Do you think a device to "tie your shoes," say, for example, would sell as well?
I will leave this OP with one opinion. I hope it doesn't start a firestorm because you don't have to agree with it. Here goes:
Technically, you are not paying the true price of gasoline. Assuming you buy into global warming, that gasoline's effect on our climate requires money to remedy. If included in the price of gasoline, which many argue would be fair, your fuel might be triple in cost, and an ESS you can turn off through multiple means is far less costly to remedy.
Sponsored