Cruiser450
Member
- First Name
- Alan
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2022
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 17
- Location
- Cape Coral, FL
- Vehicle(s)
- Rubicon 392
- Vehicle Showcase
- 1
- Thread starter
- #1
Overall very much love my 392, the engine tune does leave some room for improvement in my opinion and I'm looking to get others thoughts and experience, particularly if you tuned. Would like to see what differences you experienced and what you'd do differently
Things I've noticed
- low shift points - fine under acceleration but leave the engine in too high a gear when cruising
- don't need to be in 7th or 8th on flat road doing 50-60 mph (engine luggs when you want some acceleration)
- don't seem to spend much time in 4 cylinder mode (seems under utilized)
- slow trans shifts
overall i'd like to see the engine spend another 500-750 rpms in whatever gear I'm in. Looking for a better balance as this engine seems overly tuned for headline HP and low end torque. Both in so much abundance seems there is a decent trade-off to be had with better fuel efficiency and engine drivability .... thoughts?
Things I've noticed
- low shift points - fine under acceleration but leave the engine in too high a gear when cruising
- don't need to be in 7th or 8th on flat road doing 50-60 mph (engine luggs when you want some acceleration)
- don't seem to spend much time in 4 cylinder mode (seems under utilized)
- slow trans shifts
overall i'd like to see the engine spend another 500-750 rpms in whatever gear I'm in. Looking for a better balance as this engine seems overly tuned for headline HP and low end torque. Both in so much abundance seems there is a decent trade-off to be had with better fuel efficiency and engine drivability .... thoughts?
Sponsored
