Sources say it will be a ā1942 Special Editionāthere will be an amphibious model in conjunction with watercar
It's probably a tune. SRT had a tuned 2.0L Wrangler at Easter Jeep Safari a few years ago, but they said it wouldn't be offered as a performance tune. Maybe the Evo has that tune.As much as I would love that hp/tq figure, Idkā¦. Chevy has done well with the 2.7L with 310hp/430tq and thats already running a pretty high amount of torque, and was built from the ground up to be up to diesel standards.
Iād want to know what they improved other than just boost pressure to make that happen, and hopefully it doesnāt stay at just 2.0L for the sake of spooling the (assumed) bigger turbo quickly.
Donāt think itās a slightly bigger turbo? No added oil squirrels on the pistons, etc? Just essentially more boost? Na, I think there is more to the story. OEM usually sizes stock turbos just over the size needed to achieve the goal, that way itās not over worked, and spools up as quickly as possible.It's probably a tune. SRT had a tuned 2.0L Wrangler at Easter Jeep Safari a few years ago, but they said it wouldn't be offered as a performance tune. Maybe the Evo has that tune.
Could very well be what you say, or a bit of both. I guess we'll find out for sure once the engine is released.Donāt think itās a slightly bigger turbo? No added oil squirrels on the pistons, etc? Just essentially more boost? Na, I think there is more to the story. OEM usually sizes stock turbos just over the size needed to achieve the goal, that way itās not over worked, and spools up as quickly as possible.
Either way a new tune is involved, so no doubt youāre correct there.Could very well be what you say, or a bit of both. I guess we'll find out for sure once the engine is released.
392 Penultimate EditionDifferent color options and maybe the final final final 392 edition.
Maybe half doors will come back?
I'm quite certain that your certainty is based on dreams.Iām certain independant suspension is on itās way, but certainly with the next generation. I doubt theyād try that on the current model.
Weāll see I guess, weāll see.I'm quite certain that your certainty is based on dreams.
It makes no sense. It's been looked at by the bean counters before. But the simple fact is that the Wrangler sells well, and part of the reason it does, is because it's the last real SUV with solid axles. If someone wants IFS, the market is flooded with them.Weāll see I guess, weāll see.
Only a very very (did I say very) small percentage of owners take them rockcrawling and IFS is a whole lot better in all other spectrum of driving and at least equal in āāregularāā offroading. Yes the solid axles have more wheel travel, but most IFS equipped competition have the electronics and lockers to keep moving forward.It makes no sense. It's been looked at by the bean counters before. But the simple fact is that the Wrangler sells well, and part of the reason it does, is because it's the last real SUV with solid axles. If someone wants IFS, the market is flooded with them.