- Joined
- Apr 28, 2023
- Threads
- 29
- Messages
- 3,638
- Reaction score
- 7,877
- Location
- Twin Peaks
- Vehicle(s)
- 2025 Wrangler 2-door
- Banned
- #46
I'd agree, but only if 3 generations of "hard work" prior had led to some semblance of generational wealth in this country for the common man, and it hadn't produced some of the dumbest, poorest, most dependent, and most violent people who face fewer choices than ever.Maybe that’s it, but I think there’s more to it. Society is changing, Americans are softening and work is less valued. We’ve built a generation that expects to work less and be given more. For a person who hasn’t worked fewer than 50 hour weeks in almost forty years, the UAW contract demands were shocking. I can’t imagine demanding that much for contributing that little.
I worked my ass off even when I was getting paid very little, and so did all of the guys on my team. We cared about the mission, we shared esprit de corps, and we were driven to succeed. Hard work was a shared cultural value, and none of us wanted to underperform and let the team down. We didn’t respect people who didn’t work hard and do their best, and we disdained whiners. I never saw anybody complain about the long hours, which almost always exceeded sixty hour weeks, and occasionally required much more.
We had it easy compared to my parents’ generation, as they survived the depression. Nothing was easy for them, and work wasn’t always available, so I always felt fortunate to be able to earn as much as I could work.
One of my sons is a surgeon. On the first day of his surgical residency he and all of the other interns were gathered in an auditorium for an introduction. During that introduction the chief discussed their next six years together. When he got to the long hours he said, “Congress has limited your work weeks to 80 hours, but you will frequently work more, because the job requires more. You have a lot to learn. You can do it in six years of 80 hour weeks, or twelve years of 40 hour weeks. Which would you prefer?” Obviously, it was a rhetorical question, but the point was made: suck it up and get to work. Surgical interns have no choice, but I don’t think that message resonates with most modern Americans outside of the military.
At my work we routinely get special funding for overtime. Fifteen years ago we put rules in place to prevent people from signing up for multiple overtime shifts before others had an opportunity to sign up for even one — because prior to that rule all of the available shifts would be filled within a day or two. We don’t have to worry about that anymore. Our new workforce is different. Today, many of those shifts never get filled, even if they’re posted for several weeks. They pay better than ever, but our newest generation is less willing to work. There are exceptions, but most expect to be rewarded more for contributing less. They also complain more. For us, the net impact is measurable: we need more employees to produce the same amount of work in a year, and we spend more on attorneys and labor litigation. I think the same thing is happening everywhere except, maybe, in surgery.
I don't sympathize with "hard working martyrdom". Just because someone spent way too much time at work doesn't mean they have a right to criticize others who don't see either the philosophical or economical value in that. Some jobs more than others.
Yeah, I can see spending 80+ hours per week in a residency program to be a surgeon. The outcome looks like making $450k/year and having the time and resources to live a very meaningful life through work. That person likely wanted to become a surgeon. How many people want to become a Manufacturing Specialist II , graveyard shift?
Spending 80 hours per week digging in a coal mine? Driving a truck? Bolting dashboards to a firewall? You're starting to lose me on the on this idea that people need to throw their best years away to work, unless they love doing it and would continue doing it if they were offered a better job that paid a lot more.
Sponsored
