I’ve looked at a number of 9” wide wheels but they have -12mm offset that equates to 4.53” backspace. 0 offset on 9” is 5” backspace.On a 9" wheel, 0 offset will give you 4.5" backspace. They are directly related.
And here is where the industry contradicts itself. If you Google offset/backspace they define 0 offset as wheel hub mounting surface in line with the centerline of the wheel. But, for some reason, the calculators and charts say something different. Most wheel companies will give both measurement of you ask for them, backspace being the most applicable to our needs.I’ve looked at a number of 9” wide wheels but they have -12mm offset that equates to 4.53” backspace. 0 offset on 9” is 5” backspace.
You are correct.And here is where the industry contradicts itself. If you Google offset/backspace they define 0 offset as wheel hub mounting surface in line with the centerline of the wheel. But, for some reason, the calculators and charts say something different. Most wheel companies will give both measurement of you ask for them, backspace being the most applicable to our needs.
That is a nice calculatorFor those that are offset/backspace challenged this tool does all the work and presents the answer in a visual format that is easier for most people to understand. Just plug in the numbers on the current tires/wheels and the new ones.
https://tiresize.com/wheel-offset-calculator/
There’s a number of really useful ones on that site. Offset/backspace, tire size and comparison, speedometer correction, gear ratio. Most have visuals which help most people understand the concepts better.That is a nice calculator
this is correct.I’ve looked at a number of 9” wide wheels but they have -12mm offset that equates to 4.53” backspace. 0 offset on 9” is 5” backspace.
no, not really. no offense. you either found a page with the wrong info or you possibly interpreted it wrong. ive been in the wheel business since the TJ days. spent quite a bit of time in the wheel hall at sema. everyone uses the same calculations. its basic math. its not like the tire industry where they measure the width of a tire from different locations on the tire. its standard for wheels.And here is where the industry contradicts itself. If you Google offset/backspace they define 0 offset as wheel hub mounting surface in line with the centerline of the wheel. But, for some reason, the calculators and charts say something different. Most wheel companies will give both measurement of you ask for them, backspace being the most applicable to our needs.
Definitely not offended. However, I do have a pretty good grasp on the English language and I'm pretty good at interpretation. So when a site like... oh I don't know... Discount Tires Direct, has a diagram and clearly states:no, not really. no offense. you either found a page with the wrong info or you possibly interpreted it wrong. ive been in the wheel business since the TJ days. spent quite a bit of time in the wheel hall at sema. everyone uses the same calculations. its basic math. its not like the tire industry where they measure the width of a tire from different locations on the tire. its standard for wheels.
there is nothing wrong with the graphic you posted. you said you found other stuff that contradicts that.Definitely not offended. However, I do have a pretty good grasp on the English language and I'm pretty good at interpretation. So when a site like... oh I don't know... Discount Tires Direct, has a diagram and clearly states:
ZERO OFFSET
"The mounting surface is centered within the rim, aligned with the wheel’s centerline."
Copied right from their site, not sure how else I'm supposed to read that. The unaccounted for variable is the width measurement, and silly me, took 9" wheel width to mean 9". My simple brain did a little grade school math and divided 9 by 2 and got 4.5. That is how I got 0 offset to equal 4.5" backspace on a 9" wheel. Now that I know 9" isn't REALLY 9", and simply plugging in some metric system stuff, because hey, why not, a 9" wheel (that isn't really 9", remember) with a 4.5" (not metric) backspace has a -12mm (there it is) offset.
This is all in fun, I am a smart ass, that's how I roll. But seriously, I really didn't understand how -12mm offset was figured, now I know and I do thank you for pointing that out.
Jeez, those look HUGE for 34s! Is there some flexing going on in the rear tire in that side shot that makes them look like they fill up the wheel well more, especially with the lift? The front looks more like I'd expect. I have a JLUS with 1.5" leveler on the front and am debating between 285/70/17 and 285/75/17. I like the fuller wheel well look, but don't want to rub. I don't plan on rock-crawling, but would like to take it on trails.Sahara and Rubicon offset is the same, just diameter is different. My new rims are 17"x9 with -12mm offset. Here is what the 34" ridge grapplers look like on mine. Check out this thread, lots of pictures from a few different people that have gone this route. There are a few other threads as well and a few with 37", they seem to look good as well.
https://www.jlwranglerforums.com/forum/threads/285-75r17-on-sahara.3609/
Also, a really good site to check out is https://www.rimsntires.com/specspro.jsp they have a great app that graphically shows the differences.
That wheel will protrude 2.34” more than stock rubicon wheels.I really don’t get this whole wheel thing. Can someone tell me if these will work on a jlu Rubicon? I don’t want the tires to stick out much? Putting toyo at2 35” tires on the 18” rims.