Sponsored

Diesel coming back!?

Grayhound

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Threads
65
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
1,988
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
Jlurd
Saw this, use caution when watching this guy. I’ve been guilty of buying into some of what he says without doing my homework, but this would be exciting!

Sponsored

 

gek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
11,339
Reaction score
73,464
Location
........ somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse
Vehicle(s)
'̶𝟣̶8 ̶𝖩̶𝖫̶𝖴̶ '̶𝟤̶𝟣̶ ̶𝖶̶𝗂̶𝗅̶𝗅̶𝗒̶𝗌̶ ̶𝖬̶𝖺̶𝗇̶𝗎̶𝖺̶𝗅̶ '23 JLUR XR
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
Code Monkey
Serious question: Why are you still watching their videos, if they've proven to be full of shit?

I don't mind a little speculation, if there is sufficient evidence to back it up, but most of these videos are just people jumping to big conclusions based on a miniscule sliver of information.
 
OP
OP
Grayhound

Grayhound

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Threads
65
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
1,988
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
Jlurd
There are tidbits of truth that I’m able to garner through watching his videos
 

yokramer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
30,452
Reaction score
155,503
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'23 JLR, '26 Suzuki GSX8TT, '88 10th Anny RX7
Occupation
Snark Incarnate

jeepingib

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dusty
Joined
Jun 26, 2018
Threads
25
Messages
10,231
Reaction score
40,041
Location
College Station, TX
Vehicle(s)
18' JLUR Punk'n
Occupation
BBQ prophet
That guy is 85% Bullshit 15% waste of time.
 

Sponsored

BDinTX

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brad
Joined
Jul 18, 2020
Threads
49
Messages
2,944
Reaction score
5,448
Location
Dallas, Tx
Vehicle(s)
2020 JLU Rubicon Recon, 2021 JLU Rubicon
I'd love to see them bring back the diesel, preferably with compatible (but better) emissions after treatment equipment. I'm about to roll over 80k on mine and have some worries about parts availability down the road.
 

Ratbert

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Jun 20, 2020
Threads
159
Messages
16,014
Reaction score
24,944
Location
PNW
Vehicle(s)
2022 AEV JL370 JLURD
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
Software Engineer
Clubs
 
I'd love to see them bring back the diesel, preferably with compatible (but better) emissions after treatment equipment. I'm about to roll over 80k on mine and have some worries about parts availability down the road.
Worst-case scenario is we end up counting on Chinese manufacturers making knock-off parts.

Hell, I ended up forking out ~50% more for a turn signal LED ($335!!!) to get OEM instead of Chinese knock-offs. That's for something that's not even part of the engine. And yeah, I just checked where it was made ... Mexico.
 

Maverick909

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Threads
50
Messages
5,238
Reaction score
7,368
Location
I.E.
Website
www.instagram.com
Vehicle(s)
2018 JLU Sporticon, 1976 GMC K15, 67 Notchback Barracuda, Indian FTR
Build Thread
Link
Occupation
Electrician/ Industrial Furnace MFG
Clubs
 
zero information out there about the return of the 3.0 Line up. id bet all the money this guy is full of poooo
 

yokramer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
30,452
Reaction score
155,503
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'23 JLR, '26 Suzuki GSX8TT, '88 10th Anny RX7
Occupation
Snark Incarnate
Its coming right after the 5.7
 

Sponsored

ALeeL

Well-Known Member
First Name
Anthony
Joined
Dec 20, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
491
Reaction score
790
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLURD
I just wish that the EPA rules weren't so one size fits all. Instead of making every diesel engine meet X requirement no matter the size, they should allow smaller diesel that replace larger diesels to emit more than the regulation, as long as it does not emit more than the larger diesel it replaces.

Cummins proved this worked back in 2020 when they replaced the 6.7L in a cab over box truck with a 4.5L diesel and a electric motor hybrid setup. They had the 4.5L hybrid truck perform side by side with the 6.7L truck on the same routes between San Antonio and Columbus. They saw a 65% fuel reduction without any negative effects to performance — the 4.5L actually having quicker acceleration. The electric motors assisted on takeoff and and hard acceleration while the diesel only operated at normal highway cruise when hp demands were low.

It would be nice if we could have a 225rwhp/375rwtq 2.0L diesel, similar to the one in my BMW, that is allowed a little leeway on PM and NOx limits (just as long as it doe not emit more than the 3.0L diesel it replaces) combined with an hybrid giving it another 134 hp like the one in the 4xe. There is not doubt you could see at least mid 30 mpgs on the highway with plenty of power. But EPA rules force the same emission requirement no matter the size of the engine.

Jeep Wrangler JL Diesel coming back!? 1780942929804-1j
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Grayhound

Grayhound

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Jul 30, 2022
Threads
65
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
1,988
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
Jlurd
You make a valid point in net reduction being more important than a one size fits all standard.

i get the standard should be easier to hold but everything is a case by case anyway. So looking at net positive impact doesn’t seem as tough in practice as it may seem at face value
 

azjl#3

Well-Known Member
First Name
Scott
Joined
Sep 24, 2022
Threads
17
Messages
3,047
Reaction score
3,691
Location
North AZ
Vehicle(s)
2024 silver zenith or atomic silver. JLUR Extreme Recon-ish
Occupation
retired, grumpy, yet, friendly
I speculate v10 with 10spd, d60 lockers.
 

ALeeL

Well-Known Member
First Name
Anthony
Joined
Dec 20, 2022
Threads
13
Messages
491
Reaction score
790
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLURD
You make a valid point in net reduction being more important than a one size fits all standard.

i get the standard should be easier to hold but everything is a case by case anyway. So looking at net positive impact doesn’t seem as tough in practice as it may seem at face value
It was introduced to the EPA for the upcoming 2027 emissions, but they rejected it. Even though 4.5L hybrid had significantly better net emissions and fuel economy than the 6.7L, they still wanted the 4.5L diesel to meet the same restrictive standards.

The problem with having the same standards is that the emissions system causes a lot of heat, especially under heavy load. If the emissions were laxed a little to create less heat, then you would be able to crank out more power from the smaller diesels without any significant side effects. Yes, it will emit more than the current standard placed upon it, but it will still emit less than a larger engine that it can replace. Heck, even if it emits the same, the fuel economy savings aspect would still be worth it.

This is one reason why I hate the bureaucracy of the EPA that only cares about meeting an emissions number and not about any net emissions or the secondary emissions(like the creation of the DEF industry) that it takes to meet those numbers. But many people see the EPA as god and if you don't think the same then you must want to go back to the days when there was a haze over every city.
 
Last edited:

2nd 392

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jun 20, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
9,967
Reaction score
16,679
Location
Ca
Vehicle(s)
Grand Cherokee srt.V10 Dodge 4x
It was introduced to the EPA for the upcoming 2027 emissions, but they rejected it. Even though 4.5L hybrid had significantly better net emissions and fuel economy than the 6.7L, they still wanted the 4.5L diesel to meet the same restrictive standards.

The problem with having the same standards is that the emissions system causes a lot of heat, especially under heavy load. If the emissions were laxed a little to create less heat, then you would be able to crank out more power from the smaller diesels without any significant side effects. Yes, it will emit more than the current standard placed upon it, but it will still emit less than a larger engine that it can replace. Heck, even if it emits the same, the fuel economy savings aspect would still be worth it.

This is one reason why I hate the bureaucracy of the EPA that only cares about meeting an emissions number and not about any net emissions or the secondary emissions(like the creation of the DEF industry) that it takes to meet those numbers. But many people see the EPA as god and if you don't think the same then you must want to go back to the days when there was a haze over every city.
Small disagreement, some see CARB as god and if Ca uses EPA compliance it will
“Make California Smoggy Again”.

Therefore, most all vehicles are produced 50 state compliant ….. CARB must be god.
Sponsored

 
 







Top