Sponsored

Clayton 392 performance coil package installed

Fast-n-Furious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
35
Messages
756
Reaction score
802
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 392 XR
I posted my write up at the jeep392 originally, thought to share with more members and some details can be useful to some members here as well for reference.

I've been doing research on improving the 392 on-road handling and also mild off-roading. Following the footsteps of several members, I bought the Clayton 392 performance coil package (essentially 2.5" coils front and 1.5" rear) last year and finally got a chance to get them installed in the driveway.

Resources
- Stiffer coil springs to improve handling?
- Stiffer coil springs to improve handling? Or Hellwig rear sway bar?
- Do you still like Clayton performance coils?
- Bowed springs and correction pads?
- How to unplug rear diff e locker harness?

First attempt failed
Back in winter when I attempted for the first time, I was trying to do the 5-tire rotation at the same time, only lifted one corner at a time. I started with rear right but couldn't droop the axle low enough to put int the new coil while having other tires on the ground. So I took a long break and also because it was cold out there.

Second attempt succeeded
This time I kept all tires on and jacked up the front with my homemade wheel crib to get extra lift. Unbolted lower shock bolt and swaybar end link bolt to axle, one corner at a time. The front was easy and I also unscrewed the brake line bracket from LCAs. The rear was slower than I thought due to I didn't know how to unplug the diff e-locker cable harness (I don't think it's really needed since the e-parking brake cable became the limiting factor) and I also had to unbolted the track bar axle mount. The e-parking brake cable was very tight when I drooped the rear, I didn't want to relocate the cable to under the crossmember this time. I used my breaker bar to pry the rear left coil in place.

Jeep Wrangler JL Clayton 392 performance coil package installed screenshot-2024-04-28-at-3-35-28-pm-png

Jeep Wrangler JL Clayton 392 performance coil package installed screenshot-2024-04-28-at-3-45-24-pm-png


I used the torque specs as shown below. 60 ft-lb sway bar link to axle, 75 ft-lb lower shock to axle, and 90 ft-lb for the rear track bar to axle.

Jeep Wrangler JL Clayton 392 performance coil package installed img_8472-jpeg

My long reach (24") floor jack with 6" extension also comes handy, and the new Dewalt DCF891 impact wrench I bought recently made unbolting easier too.

Jeep Wrangler JL Clayton 392 performance coil package installed img_8475-jpe


Before/After comparison
My 392 XR is 2-year old, so all the factory coils have settled. It was 40-1/4" front and rear from floor to the fender flare across the center line of wheel hub. But the front door bottom pinch or rock slider is 1" lower than the rear, so it was definitely not level due to the factory rake. And I don't have a winch.

After the new coils, I waited for two days so things can settle a bit. Now the rear is 1/2" taller and the front is 1-1/2" taller (which also gives me more uptravel). I consider my jeep is level currently. The on-road handling is better too, more sporty and less floaty.

Due to this 1-1/2” increased height, I also measured the center of front axle only shifted to the driver side maybe 1/16”, no need to change the track bar. Will do more search on steering components later if I’ll ever upgrade.


Jeep Wrangler JL Clayton 392 performance coil package installed screenshot-2024-04-28-at-3-16-21-pm-png


The Clayton front coils are the same, and they appear to be a bit shorter than the stock coils. But due to the higher spring rate (188 lbs/in), they yield 1-1/2" lift final result.
Jeep Wrangler JL Clayton 392 performance coil package installed screenshot-2024-04-28-at-3-12-56-pm-png



Their rear coils are dual rate spring (137/200 lbs/in) and the right spring is taller than the left one to offset the gas tank weight. They marked with L and R so pay attention and don't use the right side spring on the rear left otherwise you'll have a lean to the right side. Due to this dual spring rate, I also noticed the rear sags 1/4" when my two little kids sit in the back. Because it compress the the top par of the spring at 137 lbs/in. orum member also commented "the rear sag was slightly greater than stock". I think it'll take a lot weight to fully sag the second part of the spring at 200 lbs/in, and their 1.5" springs are still stronger than the factory ones.

Jeep Wrangler JL Clayton 392 performance coil package installed screenshot-2024-04-28-at-3-13-43-pm-png



Any recommendations for shocks?
I don't plan to lift my rig any taller, I like the close-to-stock look and feel to maintain low center of gravity, especially when later I'll install the underbelly skids and go up to 37" tires. I've been doing research on aftermarket shocks and hope to improve the ride comfort as the stock XR shock may wear out down the road.

I think my biggest question for now is finding the right amount of extended/collapsed shock length to match the XR shocks and these new coils. I don't plan to add any coil spacers. Any recommendation is greatly appreciated.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Fast-n-Furious

Fast-n-Furious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
35
Messages
756
Reaction score
802
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 392 XR
Okay, been doing research on the Fox 2.5" DSC shocks, lots great feedback from forum members.
 
OP
OP
Fast-n-Furious

Fast-n-Furious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
35
Messages
756
Reaction score
802
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 392 XR

Tread4Lo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2020
Threads
9
Messages
514
Reaction score
648
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
22'JLURD
I'm also interest in the Clayton rear 1.5" coils, but on a diesel and not a 392. I think in our case (diesel), the springs do get swapped left to right to compensate for our tank being on the driver side. I have the front 1.5" (or essentially Clayton 2.5" front coils) already on. The diesel also have the longer bumpstop too.

I haven't pulled the trigger on them yet as I am back and forth is the springs will carry added weight. Which it sounds like they did, but only having your kids in the back and them falling a .5" is worrisome. I have 3 kids and a road trip add quite a bit of weight with gear/luggage. Maybe I do need to opt for the 2.5" rear coil. I dislike the coil spring guessing game.

The rocksport blacks do look like sweet shocks. Let us know how these two pair together.
 

TEAMSLO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Threads
23
Messages
482
Reaction score
622
Location
North Las Vegas
Vehicle(s)
23 392, gone 21 JTM & 22 JLURD
To be honest, I would probably hold off on the shock just in case you decide to go for a bigger lift. The fox and MC shocks are a pretty penny to invest just to turn around 6 months later and get ones with longer stroke.

But if you're all set to keep it regardless, then by all means...... Unfortunately I cannot comment on either as my new build has Fox on the way, was going to go MC but decided against it last minute.
 

Sponsored

OP
OP
Fast-n-Furious

Fast-n-Furious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
35
Messages
756
Reaction score
802
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 392 XR
I'm also interest in the Clayton rear 1.5" coils, but on a diesel and not a 392. I think in our case (diesel), the springs do get swapped left to right to compensate for our tank being on the driver side. I have the front 1.5" (or essentially Clayton 2.5" front coils) already on. The diesel also have the longer bumpstop too.

I haven't pulled the trigger on them yet as I am back and forth is the springs will carry added weight. Which it sounds like they did, but only having your kids in the back and them falling a .5" is worrisome. I have 3 kids and a road trip add quite a bit of weight with gear/luggage. Maybe I do need to opt for the 2.5" rear coil. I dislike the coil spring guessing game.

The rocksport blacks do look like sweet shocks. Let us know how these two pair together.
I can tell you that when my two young kids in the back and with a full tank of gas (on the passenger side), it measured less than 1/4" lower due to the dual spring rates (the first part of 137 lbs/in and the second part of 200). But would take lots of weight to fully sag the rear.

I also noticed the passenger side of the rear is 1/8" lower than the driver side, even though the passenger side coil spring is taller.

They are much better than the stock coil springs. But if carry a lot of weight in the rear or have a roof rack, think a bit more. If you go with a taller rear spring, it won't look good when it's not loaded with heavy cargo.
 
OP
OP
Fast-n-Furious

Fast-n-Furious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
35
Messages
756
Reaction score
802
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 392 XR
To be honest, I would probably hold off on the shock just in case you decide to go for a bigger lift. The fox and MC shocks are a pretty penny to invest just to turn around 6 months later and get ones with longer stroke.

But if you're all set to keep it regardless, then by all means...... Unfortunately I cannot comment on either as my new build has Fox on the way, was going to go MC but decided against it last minute.
Thanks for the insights. As you can tell I only swapped the coils after owning the rig for 2 years, I spend a lot time doing my homework before deciding on a mod. I think in general upgrading the shocks will yield better riding comfort, and I do 99% on road daily driving. It's just one way to keep life interesting with purchasing something we don't need but want:).
 

TEAMSLO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
Threads
23
Messages
482
Reaction score
622
Location
North Las Vegas
Vehicle(s)
23 392, gone 21 JTM & 22 JLURD
Welcome to the addiction.
 

fspalt

Well-Known Member
First Name
Frank
Joined
Oct 26, 2021
Threads
23
Messages
229
Reaction score
165
Location
Baltimore, MD
Vehicle(s)
2021 JLUR
Did you ever end up replacing shocks with this setup? My stock shocks are leaking and I’m looking at replacing the coils with this kit at the same time. Thinking about the new 2.5 Fox HO shocks:

https://www.extremeterrain.com/fox-...nt-shock-for-2-to-3-inch-lift-987-24-012.html

Thanks for the insights. As you can tell I only swapped the coils after owning the rig for 2 years, I spend a lot time doing my homework before deciding on a mod. I think in general upgrading the shocks will yield better riding comfort, and I do 99% on road daily driving. It's just one way to keep life interesting with purchasing something we don't need but want:).
 
OP
OP
Fast-n-Furious

Fast-n-Furious

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2022
Threads
35
Messages
756
Reaction score
802
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
2022 392 XR

Lehman47

Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Oct 30, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
5
Reaction score
6
Location
Nebraska
Vehicle(s)
2022 Wrangler 392XR
I saw you asked about the performance coils way back(my bad, this forum costs me money so i try to stay away haha) and they were still sitting in my garage never got around to getting them installed, because we traded for another 22 392 but with the XR package. Just got them installed with weekend with Clayton upper/lower control arms and track bars, went with the FOX PE 2.5 DSC shocks all around and it is a huge difference, got the 2-3" ones based on Clayton recommendations. Thought I would check in, in case you haven't gotten shocks yet.
Sponsored

 
 







Top