Better looking JK or JL?

[Silverblkrilla]

I like the JL for the advancements but personally I'm thinking I like the looks of the JK over the JL. Maybe its like every new wrangler and it takes awhile to get use to the new look. I've yet to see a JL up close and have only seen in passing and online. Really just wondering everyone's opinion. I'm guessing this has been brought up previously but I probably missed it. What's your thoughts?

Sponsored

 

[Drew777x]

On the Rubicon, the JL is absolutely better looking. On the Sport or Sahara, the upgrade to JL is more subtle to me.

 

[1quick1]

JL easy. Not that the JK looks bad. hell not like the CJ looks bad. Just gets better.

The new rubi's look unreal from the factory.

 

[Justtiffmonae]

Love the jl, before the announcement of its release I was looking into the smoky mountain because of the standard tougher look closer to a rubi but not that much. Couldn't do it though because of the lack in tech so when jl came out it was a win!

 

[ThirtyOne]

To me the JL has a lot more design touches. He JK is just a box. the JL adds character to the hood, body panels, vents, grill, bumpers. Just everywhere you look there is something subtle that adds interest.

 

[FrenchSSGTMike]

Love the jl, before the announcement of its release I was looking into the smoky mountain because of the standard tougher look closer to a rubi but not that much. Couldn't do it though because of the lack in tech so when jl came out it was a win!

Agree with you; FCA reached out to so many new potential buyers by upgrading/updating their interior !
There was no way I would’ve spent that much money on a JK, while I think the JL is worth that money now !

 

[That One Guy]

JL. All the minor, careful changes worked very well. It's an extremely good looking vehicle inside and out.

The smooth execution reminds me of TJs, in a way.

Sponsored