BRuby
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2019
- Threads
- 5
- Messages
- 754
- Reaction score
- 897
- Location
- Chilling or working out at 60+
- Vehicle(s)
- JLUR Benz Porsche-M Subie-M
How do you like the Arctic studded and what are the pros and cons you have experienced? We have the Arctic 12 on the Subie and Arctic gen 1 on a previous vehicle. Both Arctics have proven to be fantastic for our daily driver winter use non-studded. Wear has been fantastic as this compound is not mega soft wears down like an eraser. Haha! Our tread almost looks like new after years and years and a lot of very safe snow and ice and wet and dry miles.My as-delivered cost for a set of four new studded General Grabber Arctic snow tires, mounted and balanced on new wheels, was just $1,400.00. That figure is little more than a Jeep accessory order that is just getting started.![]()
Unfortunately the only 33” OEM size option looks to be the Nokian. Otherwise you can get a couple more less optimal 32” full snow options. TR has some great test info on studs vs non-stud for the Artic. Bottom line is still the same for us. If it works - it works. Who cares otherwise. Same applies for summer tires on our Porsche. Who cares if yours get a 9.7 score vs 9.8 as tested. A tire is a tire. The skill of the driver plays the biggest role in the overall driving equation. By far.
Edit: Here was from the tire change yesterday. My understanding is the tread pattern changed very slightly in year 2 to the current. This is wear after 8 years of winter usage! An eternity for a dedicated snow tire. The wet and ice performance is exemplary. Notice the stud location and snowflake design - the tread wear is minimal considering how many dry miles are on this snow tire. Almost is unbelievable. Siping and pattern and tread compound are fantastic.
Sponsored
Last edited: