Sponsored

Tire weight in decision process?

aeonixx1001

Well-Known Member
First Name
Kim
Joined
Apr 26, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
368
Reaction score
415
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2020 Jeep JL
I think the Moral of the story is: If you change Wheel and tire size, ensure everything else on your jeep supports it. Height, rubbing, weight, axles, drive lines, etc. In other words "Dont jack your JL up 6 inches with some 40's and no other mods to support, you wont like it and will suffer the ramifications.
Sponsored

 

jeepingib

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dusty
Joined
Jun 26, 2018
Threads
16
Messages
2,755
Reaction score
7,617
Location
College Station, TX
Vehicle(s)
18' JLUR Punk'n
Occupation
Mechanic
I put together a worksheet to try to determine some of the weights and costs of some 37s I then calculated a formula based on weight and price to get an idea of value per lb of lightness. The Coursers are by far the lightest, but I know almost nothing about them. The Patagonias are light and cheap, but I've heard of quite a few issues with them. Yokohama is a brand that I've known some folks to run and I'm considering them the most right now. 76 per tire is still pretty light.

BRANDMODELSIZEHEIGHTWIDTHDEPTHWEIGHTPRICEPrice/2xWeight
MilestarPatagonia37x12.5R1736.8"12.5"18/32"72273982.80
MastercraftCourser MXT37x12.5R1736.69"13.1"21/32"693001035.00
YokohamaGeo MT G00337x12.5R1736.8"13.1"21/32"76.13121187.16
YokohamaGeo X-MT37x12.5R1736.8"13"21/32"80.23281315.28
FirestoneDestination MT237x12.5R1736.8"12.5"21/32"793381335.10
M/TDeegan37x12.5R1736.7"13.1"21/32"733701350.50
CooperSTT PRO37x12.5R1736.77"13"22/32"753681380.00
BFGMT KM337x12.5R1736.5"12.5"18/32"743791402.30
GeneralGrabber X337x12.5R1736.8"12.5"21/32"79.73571422.65
M/TBaja MTZ37x12.5R1736.8"13"22/32"753861447.50
MilestarPatagonia Black37x12.5R1736.8"12.5"18/32"783731454.70
GoodyearMTR37x12.5R1736.8"12.5"21/32"753951481.25
FalkenWildpeak MT37x12.5R1736.7"12.9"21/32"81.83631484.67
ToyoOpen MT37x12.5R1736.8"12.5"21/32"843641528.80
M/TBaja Boss37x12.5R1736.8"13"22/32"793971568.15
ProCompMT237x12.5R1736.9"13.3"22/32"833801577.00
NittoTrail MT37x12.5R1736.85"13.43"21/32"84.83781602.72
NittoMud Grap37x13.5R1737.05"14.57"21/32"973871876.95
BFGKrawler37x12.5R1737"22/32"805832332.00
 

DanW

Well-Known Member
First Name
Dan
Joined
Mar 2, 2017
Threads
161
Messages
8,414
Reaction score
11,111
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
21 JLUR, 18JLUR, 08JKUR, 15 Renegade, 04 WJ
Vehicle Showcase
2
I put together a worksheet to try to determine some of the weights and costs of some 37s I then calculated a formula based on weight and price to get an idea of value per lb of lightness. The Coursers are by far the lightest, but I know almost nothing about them. The Patagonias are light and cheap, but I've heard of quite a few issues with them. Yokohama is a brand that I've known some folks to run and I'm considering them the most right now. 76 per tire is still pretty light.

BRANDMODELSIZEHEIGHTWIDTHDEPTHWEIGHTPRICEPrice/2xWeight
MilestarPatagonia37x12.5R1736.8"12.5"18/32"72273982.80
MastercraftCourser MXT37x12.5R1736.69"13.1"21/32"693001035.00
YokohamaGeo MT G00337x12.5R1736.8"13.1"21/32"76.13121187.16
YokohamaGeo X-MT37x12.5R1736.8"13"21/32"80.23281315.28
FirestoneDestination MT237x12.5R1736.8"12.5"21/32"793381335.10
M/TDeegan37x12.5R1736.7"13.1"21/32"733701350.50
CooperSTT PRO37x12.5R1736.77"13"22/32"753681380.00
BFGMT KM337x12.5R1736.5"12.5"18/32"743791402.30
GeneralGrabber X337x12.5R1736.8"12.5"21/32"79.73571422.65
M/TBaja MTZ37x12.5R1736.8"13"22/32"753861447.50
MilestarPatagonia Black37x12.5R1736.8"12.5"18/32"783731454.70
GoodyearMTR37x12.5R1736.8"12.5"21/32"753951481.25
FalkenWildpeak MT37x12.5R1736.7"12.9"21/32"81.83631484.67
ToyoOpen MT37x12.5R1736.8"12.5"21/32"843641528.80
M/TBaja Boss37x12.5R1736.8"13"22/32"793971568.15
ProCompMT237x12.5R1736.9"13.3"22/32"833801577.00
NittoTrail MT37x12.5R1736.85"13.43"21/32"84.83781602.72
NittoMud Grap37x13.5R1737.05"14.57"21/32"973871876.95
BFGKrawler37x12.5R1737"22/32"805832332.00
Btw, my brother had a set of those Mastercraft Courser MTs and loved them. They were on his YJ. He didn´t do any heavy off-roading, though, so I doubt we could speak to durability, but I´ve never heard of anyone complaining about them, either.

WTH with the Nitto Mud Grappler? I can´t imagine what they are doing with their construction that weighs so darned much.
 

Gringostarr

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
89
Reaction score
90
Location
CCCPalifornia
Vehicle(s)
2020 JLU Sport S Diesel Ocean Blue
Occupation
Architect
Even with a Diesel power plant weight was a huge factor for me since I'm already pushing that much more engine/exhaust weight from a standstill over the 3.6/2.0 which is why initially I went with take-off rubicon wheels and 33" Toyo ATIII since the Mopar diesel lift wasn't out yet. So far I've liked the ATIII's even though they weren't my first choice (Geolander X-AT were but they are comically heavy) however being patient and running through a set of 33's is letting me see how the mechanics of the new engine shake out before I do the major upgrades I have planned like a full undercarriage aluminum skid plate, lift, and finally upgrade to 34's.
 

InvertedLogic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2018
Threads
12
Messages
592
Reaction score
542
Location
Denver, CO
Vehicle(s)
20 JTR
Even with a Diesel power plant weight was a huge factor for me since I'm already pushing that much more engine/exhaust weight from a standstill over the 3.6/2.0 which is why initially I went with take-off rubicon wheels and 33" Toyo ATIII since the Mopar diesel lift wasn't out yet. So far I've liked the ATIII's even though they weren't my first choice (Geolander X-AT were but they are comically heavy) however being patient and running through a set of 33's is letting me see how the mechanics of the new engine shake out before I do the major upgrades I have planned like a full undercarriage aluminum skid plate, lift, and finally upgrade to 34's.
How have the AT3s treated you? I think they're up next for me. I see that they have a 35x11.50x17 in a load range C that's comparable in weight to a KO2.
 

Sponsored

Gringostarr

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Dec 20, 2019
Threads
3
Messages
89
Reaction score
90
Location
CCCPalifornia
Vehicle(s)
2020 JLU Sport S Diesel Ocean Blue
Occupation
Architect
How have the AT3s treated you? I think they're up next for me. I see that they have a 35x11.50x17 in a load range C that's comparable in weight to a KO2.
They’re not bad. I did a road trip from LA to Denver and back and they were great on road with wind noise drowning out tire noise. Only did a gravel trail to get to a campsite and a proper 5 mile stretch of trail to get to another with only complaint being that the treads won’t really eject rocks until you’re either at highway speeds or pick them out yourself.

I only have 4k miles on them right now so no clue how they will be in a year or two but for now I’d have no problem sticking with the AT3’s when it’s time to upsize... unless of course the X-AT’s start coming in C load range by then.
 

shekmark

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Jul 21, 2019
Threads
26
Messages
584
Reaction score
443
Location
Manasquan, NJ
Vehicle(s)
2018 JLUR
Occupation
Yes
Vehicle Showcase
1
I went with Duratracs 35 . They are one of the lightest. Almost kept my stock wheels because they are very light, but changed my mind and bought AEV when they were on sale.
Sponsored

 
 



Top