Sponsored

Throwing 'Quality Control' out the window

lowmpg

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Apr 2, 2021
Threads
33
Messages
879
Reaction score
1,696
Location
Kent Island, Maryland
Vehicle(s)
2021 Rubicon, 2025 Ram Limited
I’d say that’s fair. I’d also be willing to bet because of the production crunch that’s really hammering the line now that they’re rushing the paint/undercoating a little more. For instance, when mine went through the line, it went through all the stages over the course of a few days; it didn’t go from A-B in one shot like a bunch of people are seeing right now.
That probably isn't too far off reality as the race to make orders. The only blessing if you happen to have that bad luck is it is easy enough to paint yourself.
Sponsored

 

aldo98229

Well-Known Member
First Name
Aldo
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
11,102
Reaction score
28,052
Location
Bellingham, WA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Jeep Gladiator, 2018 Fiat 124 Spider
Occupation
Market Research
Vehicle Showcase
3
Let’s read the chart fine print:

"Rankings are based on numerical scores, and not necessarily on statistical significance."

These rankings are really just pointless. It's like polling an internet forum for problems with a vehicle, you're going to find more complaining than not.
No. You are throwing the baby with the bath water.

All the fine print says is the rankings are not statistically significant; but the scores themselves are valid.

What this means is that, for instance, the differences between Kia and Hyundai, 145 vs 148, might not be statistically different, but the 5-point gap between Kia and Lexus might be. It is impossible to know exactly without JD Power disclosing what the confidence interval is.

What we do know from looking at this chart, though, is that the Koreans, Toyota/Lexus, Porsche and GM perform above industry average; Ford is right around average. FCA, Subaru, Nissan/Infiniti, Honda/Acura and most other European brands, perform below the norm.
 

lowmpg

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ryan
Joined
Apr 2, 2021
Threads
33
Messages
879
Reaction score
1,696
Location
Kent Island, Maryland
Vehicle(s)
2021 Rubicon, 2025 Ram Limited
No. You are throwing the baby with the bath water.

All the fine print says is the rankings are not statistically significant; but the scores themselves are valid.

What this means is that, for instance, the differences between Kia and Hyundai, 145 vs 148, might not be statistically different, but the 5-point gap between Kia and Lexus might be. It is impossible to know exactly without JD Power disclosing what the confidence interval is.

What we do know from looking at this chart, though, is that the Koreans, Toyota/Lexus, Porsche and GM perform above industry average; Ford is right around average. FCA, Subaru, Nissan/Infiniti, Honda/Acura and most other European brands, perform below the norm.
Did you use these rankings to determine whether you'd buy your vehicle?
 

aldo98229

Well-Known Member
First Name
Aldo
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
11,102
Reaction score
28,052
Location
Bellingham, WA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Jeep Gladiator, 2018 Fiat 124 Spider
Occupation
Market Research
Vehicle Showcase
3
Did you use these rankings to determine whether you'd buy your vehicle?
No. But it'd sure stop me from buying a Subaru, a Nissan or, God forbid...an Acura
 

huberro2

Well-Known Member
First Name
Ron
Joined
Mar 24, 2020
Threads
8
Messages
63
Reaction score
35
Location
Fountain Valley CA
Vehicle(s)
JL Rubicon 2019
Occupation
Engineer
What I learned from the Business school, was Asian countries have little natural resources, if they can't sell something, they starve. That's some motivation. Back in the 60's, "Made in Japan" meant cheap worthless junk. They took TQM (Total Quality Manufacturing) to heart and now Toyota is the number one manufacture of cars in the world. Jeep should take note. But, not all Asian car manufactures embrace TQM. Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) are sometimes base on how long the average person owns a vehicle before trading in/dumping, thus engineered to that time frame (3-5 years). Best judge is to look around or go to the junk yard. Whose cars, are still operational after that period? My guess it is Toyotas and Hondas win for the long term. But not every owner is in for the long term. They get bored quickly (3-5 years) and want a new vehicle. So, it may not be the manufacture's fault. They are in line with their customer base. Question is which camp are you in? Short game or the long game?
 

Sponsored

aldo98229

Well-Known Member
First Name
Aldo
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
11,102
Reaction score
28,052
Location
Bellingham, WA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Jeep Gladiator, 2018 Fiat 124 Spider
Occupation
Market Research
Vehicle Showcase
3
Japan, Germany and, later, Korea, got bombed to smithereens.

That might have more to do with it than anything else.
 

nissanza

New Member
First Name
Nissan
Joined
Aug 17, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
South Africa
Website
www.nissan.co.za
Vehicle(s)
Nissan Navara
It is very normal to any american vehicle brands after some years of using it. That's why most of the people prefer Japanese car brands like Toyota, Nissan and Mitsubishi.
 

aldo98229

Well-Known Member
First Name
Aldo
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
11,102
Reaction score
28,052
Location
Bellingham, WA
Vehicle(s)
2023 Jeep Gladiator, 2018 Fiat 124 Spider
Occupation
Market Research
Vehicle Showcase
3
It is very normal to any american vehicle brands after some years of using it. That's why most of the people prefer Japanese car brands like Toyota, Nissan and Mitsubishi.
I wouldn’t categorize Nissan as a quality automaker.

Certainly not on par with Toyota.
Sponsored

 
 







Top