BellValleyAT
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Greg
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2024
- Threads
- 11
- Messages
- 86
- Reaction score
- 77
- Location
- Rhode Island
- Vehicle(s)
- 2025 JLUR
- Thread starter
- #1
Does the JL Rubicon TCase have a slip yoke rear output or fixed?
Sponsored
Thanks!Fixed
2 door does tend to bind at lower lift heights than a 4 door. The rear driveshaft is so much shorter on the 2dr.The rear is good at any reasonable lift height. The front runs into issues on droop. Shocks over 29" extended length are problematic.
Appreciate it!They use Rzeppa joints in the JL at the transfer case and rear axle. The front axle has a single U-joint. Rzeppas are CV joints. Though they can't tolerate as much angle as a double cardan joint. And they're weaker than they should be. So upgrading to U-joints is a good idea if you go over 2-3" of lift. Lots of places sell upgrade kits.
But where is that cutoff? I've wheeled with several 3" lifted JLs on stock shafts. Which is why I said reasonable lift heights. You don't see too many 4"+ lifted JLs and they'd look silly if they weren't on 40"+ tires. At that point you're probably into 60s and the stock shafts are long gone anyway. I know for a fact on the JLUR that the stock shaft is fine on 31" extended length shocks at full droop in the rear.2 door does tend to bind at lower lift heights than a 4 door. The rear driveshaft is so much shorter on the 2dr.
4 doors can flex a lot more than the 2 doors without binding. The axle moves just as much but with the longer driveshaft the angles never get too far.But where is that cutoff? I've wheeled with several 3" lifted JLs on stock shafts. Which is why I said reasonable lift heights. You don't see too many 4"+ lifted JLs and they'd look silly if they weren't on 40"+ tires. At that point you're probably into 60s and the stock shafts are long gone anyway. I know for a fact on the JLUR that the stock shaft is fine on 31" extended length shocks at full droop in the rear.
I agree, but 2dr or 4dr the front is the same. Obviously the rear on a 2dr will bind before the 4dr, but I haven't seen it as an issue with any "normal" builds. Most 2dr guys won't go past 37s and 3" and at that point it didn't seem to be an issue.4 doors can flex a lot more than the 2 doors without binding. The axle moves just as much but with the longer driveshaft the angles never get too far.
Most 4 doors don't push the angle too far.
And it's not so much the lift height as the droop distance, especially on the front axle. And there's way too many variables in that equation. Shock travel, whether you outboard the lower shock mount to eliminate binding, the joints in your control arms, etc.
Yes. Fronts are virtually the same 2dr to 4dr.I agree, but 2dr or 4dr the front is the same. Obviously the rear on a 2dr will bind before the 4dr, but I haven't seen it as an issue with any "normal" builds. Most 2dr guys won't go past 37s and 3" and at that point it didn't seem to be an issue.
I see some people putting RTV on the splines of the yoke, and some people putting it on the contact surface of the nut. Pros and cons of each? Why not both?Here's the video we did on my front driveshaft swap. I show the Rzeppa next to the double cardan joint in here.