Whaler27
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Alex
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2020
- Threads
- 59
- Messages
- 2,665
- Reaction score
- 5,331
- Location
- Oregon
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 JL, 2016 Jeep Grand Cherokee Altitude Ecodiesel, 2005 Mustang GT, 2018 Ford Raptor, 2018 BMW R1200GSA, 2020 Honda Monkeybikes (2), 1972 Honda CT-70, 1980 Honda CT-70,
- Occupation
- Saving the world :-)
I prefer the 488s with 37’s on the JL. Seems like the perfect balance. On the TJ I would have needed 513s, at least.East Coast Gear Supply is the best place to get them. Use PC2021 to get 10% off the cost.
If you are ever thinking that you want to go to 37's, seriously consider going 5.13 on the gearing.
You can spend a lifetime reading debates about the “right” gear ratio for any particular tire size. In the end it distills to personal preference in the context of your use profile. If you ‘re a rock crawler the balance is very different from the guy who wants to overland, but also use his Jeep as a commuter.
If you like the balance of power and fuel economy with OEM 34” tires and 4.10 gears, then you’ll like the balance with 4:88s and 37” tires. All things being equal, that combination (488s with 37s) will produce slightly higher RPM levels for any given speed, but it will be pretty close, and a few extra RPMs is nice to have when turning the extra weight. For perspective, assuming no interference/contribution from the transmission changing the gear selection, 488s with 39“/40” tires are a closer match for OEM (34” and 410) RPM level at any given speed, but there are other physics in play which absorb energy and change that balance.
I‘m not a rock crawler, but I go through little patches of challenging rock garden, and the JL does just fine on 37s with OEM gears. Still, I’m going to follow my brother to 488s because it will make the top gear more accessible, improve low end grunt, and, hopefully, retain existing fuel economy. I have zero interest in 513s.
One more thought, the pinion head gets a little smaller as you transition from 488 to 513 and up. Some suggest that results in loss of durability with each step. I doubt there’s much difference, at least through the low 5s, as the same number of teeth are in contact with the ring at any given time. Still, equivalent forces on slightly smaller teeth has got to have some impact on gear life, even if small. That, and the inevitable loss in fuel economy, makes me even happier with the 488 balance.
Sponsored
Last edited: