Sponsored

CO2Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
250
Reaction score
367
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
21 JLURD
So I thought I'd post my feedback here to help anyone else considering these shocks for their builds. I bought all 3 so you don't have to!

Vehicle: 21 JLUR Diesel with a 2.5" Clayton lift and 37" Cooper Discoverer ATs.

On road PSI: 30-32 / Off-road PSI: 17-20

Backstory: I read EVERYTHING on this forum and others for every shock on the market and found that shocks are a very personal matter and everyone interprets their performance and attributes very differently. Here's where I landed with each of these after buying and running all 3 both on and off-road in CO.

FOX 2.0 (~$900): I bought these with the Clayton lift. Initially they were significantly firmer than the Rubicon shocks, but not in a harsh way.

PROS: It felt better on road and less squishy off-road. They do absorb bumps and mild terrain well. As long as both tires hit the obstacle at the same time it's great (more on this later). They feel compliant on the road to separate road imperfections from the driver in most cases.

CONS:
After about 8k miles I had one start leaking (fixed under warranty but I paid shipping - note I bought a 5th shock new as I couldn't be without my vehicle while they warrantied it). Around 15k miles, I started to get a noticeable increase in body roll that wasn't there initially around town.
*Here's the one thing that made me start looking elsewhere - when your tires come off something or bump something unevenly, the Fox 2.0s allow the Jeep to rock side to side for several cycles and passengers get tossed pretty violently in the process. There isn't enough resistance in the shock to slow down the momentum. It's possible this is a diesel/weight issue but it was rough and combined with the body roll led me to look at some thing else. No mods I have add weight besides the tires.

Bilstein 5100 ($425)
So I went with these next to see what a digressive shock was like and because they're cheap!

PROs: These control the Jeeps motion fantastically on and off-road. The previous rocking motion was gone as was the body roll when cornering. I read many people viewed these as harsh so was worried about off-road performance. I had the opposite experience. Off-road (crawling and rocky trails) my family noted that the ride was MUCH less rough and I attribute that to the 5100s ability to control the bounce and weight of the Jeep better. I love the feedback on the trails and thought it was a great experience overall. Very pleasantly surprised.

CONs: Here's where the reviews were correct - on the street you will feel the small striations and imperfections in the road more. The Jeep tends to follow small dips in the road downward where the Foxes would only dip the suspension (if that makes sense). To me it's the same feeling as a performance car - less cushy and more firm to give better handling, but you'll feel the road more. *If roads in your area suck, you might get sick of this, but I didn't see it as a big deal* One other thing I noted is that on the trails the 5100s got HOT. Which is why I tried...

Bilstein 5160s (~$1k)
These are pitched as 5100s (digressive), but with resis and that seems mostly accurate in my experience.

PROs: These are really close to the firmness of the 5100s, but not quite. To me it's the perfect middle ground between the Foxes and the 5100s - controlled and responsive without being overly harsh. Off-road they perform like the 5100s with composure and still control the rocking well without the heat issues. To me, this is the experience I was looking for all along and, as far as shocks go, a grand isn't all that bad.

CONs: They're the most expensive of the 3 and you still feel the imperfections in the road like with the 5100s. That's it.

Summary:
I was happy with the Foxes initially and they're the most compliant especially if you're focused more on comfort on road than composure and control/handling. They absorb more of the little stuff like potholes and speed bumps but were not good enough at minimizing the shake and roll of the body and it's contents for me. Would also hesitate if your Jeep runs heavy as I think they don't control weight/motion as well.

If you're on a budget, the 5100s are a damn good shock. If I didn't do long trails with a ton of rocks and crawling obstacles that heat up the shock, I would have stopped at the 5100s and been happy as a clam.

The 5160s are all the good things the 5100s provided without having to worry about the heat fade AND feel just a touch less harsh. These were the exact ride I was looking for both on and off-road and give me a ton of confidence in how the Jeeps going to react and handle in every situation.

Hope this helps someone!
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

dos531

Well-Known Member
First Name
Derek
Joined
Apr 28, 2021
Threads
16
Messages
65
Reaction score
108
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
22 392xr, 12 Gallardo Performante, 86 Porsche 930
I had the same experience with leakage on the Fox 2.0s on my first JL. 2 started leaking within a couple thousand miles of install. They expected me to ship them and wait a month to get them warrantied. Terrible customer service. Bought some bilstein 5160s and got the fox warrantied and sold them. Swore ill never buy another fox product.

The 5160s impressed me so much for the price that when I built my 392 I wanted to run bilsteins again. Running the bilstein 8100 bypass shocks on my 392, theyre just so good.

Fox can suck a dick.
 

Soapy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Scott
Joined
Jul 7, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
278
Reaction score
604
Location
Idaho
Vehicle(s)
2025 Wrangler Rubicon X 2 door
I have had pretty much the same experience with my Power Wagon. ONce I put the 5160 shocks on it all my problems were solved and still using them on it today. My 2 Jeep Rubicon X showed shock fade the first time I took it out wheeling. I went right to the 8100s on it and love the more controlled ride. Fox shocks just have to be rebuilt too soon IMO.
 
OP
OP

CO2Wrangler

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2023
Threads
9
Messages
250
Reaction score
367
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
21 JLURD
Get any fade with the 5100s? How long did you go before fade?

Have 5100s myself, so I know to move to the 5160s if needed!
To be clear, I didn't experience fade when I was running the 5100s, but they were hot to the point you couldn't touch them after offroading. The move to resis to avoid potential fade was only a precaution on my part and perhaps was a bit alarmist.

Still no regrets and I'm considering holding onto the 5100s.
 

Sponsored

daroutergod

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Mar 21, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
102
Reaction score
116
Location
United States
Vehicle(s)
2023 Wrangler "High Tide" edition
I ran 5100's on my 2012 2 door JK when I did a 2 inch lift and switched to 33's at around 15k. Never a problem. I had about 60k on those and replaced them with new 5100's when I put all new front end (ball joints, rod ends, ect) on it at 75k, and was still riding nice when I traded it in on my JL at 135k. I never gave it a thought when off roading thou about them heating up but makes sense now that I think back on it.
 

yokramer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
30,674
Reaction score
156,365
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
'23 JLR, '26 Suzuki GSX8TT, '88 10th Anny RX7
Occupation
Snark Incarnate
Loved the 5100s on my Xterra and had 0 regrets getting them with my RK lift and holy balls the difference from the stock rubi shocks to these. Ill be going 5160 or 8100 when these are dead for sure.
 

flick2614

Well-Known Member
First Name
Randy
Joined
Aug 7, 2024
Threads
61
Messages
933
Reaction score
2,050
Location
AZ
Vehicle(s)
2021 Jeep JLU Rubicon Diesel
Clubs
 
I have the Diesel on 37's as well. I've found that with the weight of the diesel 2.0's just don't cut it if you are looking for actual performance. The body roll and cycling you mentioned is non-existent when you move to 2.5's. In my mind you will never see a performance gain from the same diameter shock as Stock.
 

andy29847

Well-Known Member
First Name
Andy
Joined
Oct 22, 2022
Threads
15
Messages
440
Reaction score
714
Location
Trenton, SC
Vehicle(s)
2020 JLUR
I put Bilstein 5100 shocks on my 2005 TJ. When I ran over a quarter, I could tell if it was heads or tails. :)

I used the stock shocks on my 2020 Wrangler Rubicon for 55,000 miles. The first set was changed out at 40,000 miles when one of the shocks was leaking. The second set (I bought some take offs) were still OK when I decided to lift my Jeep.

I bought a Mopar lift and that came with the Fox 2.5" shocks. I like the way the Wrangler drives with the FOX shocks - less body lean, less back and forth rocking, great on forest roads.

I have a 2020 Gladiator Rubicon that will get new shocks soon. I'll probably put a Mopar lift on the truck then too.

The price of the Mopar lift kit is less than the cost of 4 new shocks. The unknown for me is how long the 2.5" fox shocks will last.

Something not mentioned here is that the high-quality shocks always seem to be in short supply.

Jeep Wrangler JL Fox 2.0 vs. Bilstein 5100 vs. Bilstein 5160 shocks -- my comparison review / feedback bilstein


Jeep Wrangler JL Fox 2.0 vs. Bilstein 5100 vs. Bilstein 5160 shocks -- my comparison review / feedback quadrateck lift glad


Jeep Wrangler JL Fox 2.0 vs. Bilstein 5100 vs. Bilstein 5160 shocks -- my comparison review / feedback fox shocks
 
Last edited:

Soapy

Well-Known Member
First Name
Scott
Joined
Jul 7, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
278
Reaction score
604
Location
Idaho
Vehicle(s)
2025 Wrangler Rubicon X 2 door
Try shock Surplus or suspensionlifts.com. Shock surplus has them in stock.
 

Sponsored

scorpionsix

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2025
Threads
22
Messages
497
Reaction score
763
Location
Denver
Vehicle(s)
2020 Rubicon Unlimited
To be clear, I didn't experience fade when I was running the 5100s, but they were hot to the point you couldn't touch them after offroading. The move to resis to avoid potential fade was only a precaution on my part and perhaps was a bit alarmist.

Still no regrets and I'm considering holding onto the 5100s.
If you decide you would part with the 5100s, I would be interested. My used Wrangler came with the Mopar lift including Fox shocks and I'm not impressed. Don't know how many miles are on the shocks, the vehicle is at the 65K mark. I'm on the south side of Denver.
 

Spank

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2017
Threads
28
Messages
2,697
Reaction score
4,579
Location
Colorado
Vehicle(s)
2018 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon, 2020 Dodge Challenger RT Scat Pack
The 5100 will always be the best shock for the price. They simply can't be beat. I switched back to them after my third Mopar Fox shock started leaking. I don't know what's happening over at Fox, but they can't seem to make these things without them pissing oil anymore.
 

Tread4Lo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2020
Threads
9
Messages
514
Reaction score
648
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
22'JLURD
I ran the Clayton 1.5" springs with stock shocks on my diesel Jeep for around 10k miles. It was good, but I didn't care for the corning or uneven roads. I could feel the whole Jeep wallowing around when one corner would dip or bump when the others weren't.

I recently switched the shocks to the AEV 5100's. I don't know where they are in the dampening with the stock 5100's, but I thoroughly enjoy these more than stock. Hitting bumps in the road are felt, but it's more if the moment you hit and not afterwards with endless bounce. Those same roads with whoops and/or evenness is much more controlled. I haven't had them offroad yet, but I would assume they would work just like the do with the street driving.

I'm impressed with the 5100's. I wish I would have gone the 5160's, but we will cross that bridge once I see a spot these 5100's leave me wanting.
 

Gio

Well-Known Member
First Name
Gio
Joined
Oct 14, 2020
Threads
7
Messages
502
Reaction score
1,351
Location
MN
Vehicle(s)
24 Willys XR 2.0,
Occupation
Retired
I'm on 5160s and like them. They are a touch stiff for my JLUR 2.0T.
I am too, although they are the Bilsteins that accompany the Mopar lift. I'm assuming the valving is different and specifically tuned for the 2.0T JLU we have so there may be some subtle changes from the 5160s directly from Bilstein.

I can't compare these shocks apples to apples with the previous Fox 2.0 shocks we had on our 2021 Willys because that rig was on E rated tires. I'd still agree that they are more firm than the Fox shocks even though we are on C rated tires with this rig.

I feel more planted and stable with the Bilsteins at higher speeds for sure. Simple around town rides may have been more cushy with the Fox shocks and I'm sure if that rig was on C rated tires I would have noticed more. I have been very happy with how they (Bilsteins) have handled some of the trials we've been on.

Jeep Wrangler JL Fox 2.0 vs. Bilstein 5100 vs. Bilstein 5160 shocks -- my comparison review / feedback eRGZYJ5

Jeep Wrangler JL Fox 2.0 vs. Bilstein 5100 vs. Bilstein 5160 shocks -- my comparison review / feedback Rj8Kr8D


Does anybody know If the Mopar lift Bilsteins shocks are any different than the 5160's and what those differences are?
Sponsored

 
 







Top