- First Name
- Steven
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2020
- Threads
- 27
- Messages
- 1,706
- Reaction score
- 3,704
- Location
- Chicago
- Website
- www.youtube.com
- Vehicle(s)
- 2020 Wrangler Recon
- Build Thread
- Link
- Occupation
- Photographer/ Content Creator
- Thread starter
- #121
Suspension Upgrades Stage 1 -Part 3
Alright, time to share measurements and driving impressions. To start off, here's a pic of the 392 on stock springs, 37's and my current mods.
Measurements are taken through the center of the wheel to the bottom edge of the fender extension: F -41.5" R - 41.25"
...and the new set-up...
Measurements: F - 43.5" R - 42.5"
With the new Clayton 2.5" springs I gained 2" on the front and 1.25" on the rear. I love the new stance!
So how's the ride/handling? The Clayton springs feel perfect, delivering a firmer more controlled ride. The 392 feels more precise on the road. Even the steering feels a little better. Cornering is near perfectly flat and brake dive is gone, which I attribute to the drop brackets. The ride is still super comfortable. I notice less body movement as well. I think Clayton did a great job selecting the spring rates.
Here's the specc's on the springs for the 392.
Front:
Spring Rate = 188 lbs/in
Free Length = 19.375"
Rear:
Spring rate 1 = 165 lbs/in
Spring rate 2 = 230 lbs/in
Free Length Left = 17.00"
Free length Right = 17.75"
Speaking drop brackets, you can see in this pic how flat the LCA's are...
Metalcloak provides a recessed bolt on the bottom of the frame
Because I haven't decided on what skid(s) I'm going to run, we re-installed the stock exhaust cross bar
I mentioned in an earlier post that I really wasn't concerned with the clearance I was giving up with the drop brackets, and here's why. On the 392, the exhaust cross over is the low point. The MC drop brackets may actually provide some protection on the trail...we'll see.
A few details on this set-up. With the Jeep on the alignment rack the axles are centered via the new adj. track bars we were able to adjust caster at just over 5 degrees, which was what I was looking for.
That's it for this post. See ya soon on the next one
-Steven
Alright, time to share measurements and driving impressions. To start off, here's a pic of the 392 on stock springs, 37's and my current mods.
Measurements are taken through the center of the wheel to the bottom edge of the fender extension: F -41.5" R - 41.25"
...and the new set-up...
Measurements: F - 43.5" R - 42.5"
With the new Clayton 2.5" springs I gained 2" on the front and 1.25" on the rear. I love the new stance!
So how's the ride/handling? The Clayton springs feel perfect, delivering a firmer more controlled ride. The 392 feels more precise on the road. Even the steering feels a little better. Cornering is near perfectly flat and brake dive is gone, which I attribute to the drop brackets. The ride is still super comfortable. I notice less body movement as well. I think Clayton did a great job selecting the spring rates.
Here's the specc's on the springs for the 392.
Front:
Spring Rate = 188 lbs/in
Free Length = 19.375"
Rear:
Spring rate 1 = 165 lbs/in
Spring rate 2 = 230 lbs/in
Free Length Left = 17.00"
Free length Right = 17.75"
Speaking drop brackets, you can see in this pic how flat the LCA's are...
Metalcloak provides a recessed bolt on the bottom of the frame
Because I haven't decided on what skid(s) I'm going to run, we re-installed the stock exhaust cross bar
I mentioned in an earlier post that I really wasn't concerned with the clearance I was giving up with the drop brackets, and here's why. On the 392, the exhaust cross over is the low point. The MC drop brackets may actually provide some protection on the trail...we'll see.
A few details on this set-up. With the Jeep on the alignment rack the axles are centered via the new adj. track bars we were able to adjust caster at just over 5 degrees, which was what I was looking for.
That's it for this post. See ya soon on the next one
-Steven
Sponsored
Last edited: