Agree - pretty sure eTorque units on 2.0t and 3.6 are liquid cooled. The eTorque in Hemi is air cooled.I would respectfully disagree on the eTorque generator being air cooled on the 3.6
My 2020 has 3 coolant reservoirs. The forward most one, in front of the windshield wiper fluid, has a line that goes directly to the front casing of the eTorque generator.
I own a CJ-7 too, so that should tell you how important reliability is to me.You are clearly someone who doesn’t spend much time sweating reliability issues. And good for you. That’s probably the best way to live. I’m not being sarcastic here. I mean that.
Aside from the 4Runner, there’s not a proper 4x4 you can order right now that makes me particularly comfortable from a long term reliability standpoint. The Bronco has DI and turbos on both engines. Jeep has a DI turbo, an Italian diesel, a brand new 4xe, an eTorque V6, or an under-developed manual transmission. Choose the form of your destructor!
And let’s not even start on the new Defender.
You can turn it off. There’s a button on the dashThis is something that can't be turned off by a button on the dash correct? It just works all the time right?
Most people believe that it functions as intended when its new. The argument is that its a problem waiting to happen. Its a complicated system, controlled by a computer, that provides minimal to no benefit other than lower federal emissions and will almost certainly fail as the vehicle gets older. Jeep people want a simple, rugged, reliable vehicle that is easy to self maintain. The eTorque system is the exact opposite of that. It has no business being installed on a Wrangler.Wow , I just ordered a 2021 Rubicon last week and had no idea really what the etorque option was until I read this. Should I be nervous or do most believe it works well and I'll be happy? I currently have a 2016 Sahara with the V6. Will I notice much difference?
The Jeep you're speaking of has not existed in 50 years.Most people believe that it functions as intended when its new. The argument is that its a problem waiting to happen. Its a complicated system, controlled by a computer, that provides minimal to no benefit other than lower federal emissions and will almost certainly fail as the vehicle gets older. Jeep people want a simple, rugged, reliable vehicle that is easy to self maintain. The eTorque system is the exact opposite of that. It has no business being installed on a Wrangler.
This is the real place for EVs in our lifetime. There are a lot of multi-car families in this country, and pretty much all of them have at least one vehicle that is a "commuter"...a perfect place for an EV to fit. Something that does 30-70 miles each day, then can be parked in a garage and charged slowly overnight. That's the most attractive case for an EV because it would offer the best fuel savings and have almost no downsides at all. Said family would still have another gas vehicle or two to use for longer range trips.The EV market will grow, and service all those with short commutes who aren't worried about road trips, and who can afford the chargers, etc. But then it will slow significantly, because there are many who want to be able to drive for more than one "tank" and only have to stop for 10 mins or less to "refuel". When EV's can stand on their own merits against ICE's, there won't need to be tax incentives to do so or laws trying to ban ICE's.
It would take as long to standardize EV architecture as it would to upgrade the US electrical grid. Add to that the fact that all those stations swapping out batteries would still need to charge them and you basically have all the same problems. You're really only solving the charging time issue.One short term solution I've heard is standardizing battery packs. You drive into a station, your low battery is swapped for a full one and off you go. But that still takes a lot of development and logistics to even figure out how to do. Not to mention once battery tech changes the standard battery size or charging might change and now you have to tear all that up.
I agree that a commuter car is the perfect place for EVs and hybrids. I will make every effort to avoid buying an eTorque Jeep. On the other hand, if I could get the full EV Magneto with the 6 speed for a cummeter vehicle that would be an EV worth drooling over. There is a simple beauty to that machine.This is the real place for EVs in our lifetime. There are a lot of multi-car families in this country, and pretty much all of them have at least one vehicle that is a "commuter"...a perfect place for an EV to fit. Something that does 30-70 miles each day, then can be parked in a garage and charged slowly overnight. That's the most attractive case for an EV because it would offer the best fuel savings and have almost no downsides at all. Said family would still have another gas vehicle or two to use for longer range trips.
It would take as long to standardize EV architecture as it would to upgrade the US electrical grid. Add to that the fact that all those stations swapping out batteries would still need to charge them and you basically have all the same problems. You're really only solving the charging time issue.
Since 2018 for the Wrangler.How many years has eTorque been offered?
So much good information in your post. I learned how modern engineering avoids the carbon build up with antifreeze cool turbos. And how more cooling lines keep these hot engines cooler. Thank God for modern engineering otherwise we would be still driving the original v6 3.8 mini-van engine.The 2.0's intercooler is smaller in physical size due to liquid cooling. Turbochargers require cooling of the bearing and shaft assembly that sits in between its exhaust and intake turbine housings. This is traditionally done with the same motor oil that also lubricates it. The one hitch in the giddy up with that, is the high potential of oil "coking" on the bearing which leads to abrasive carbon buildup. Motor oil cooled turbos should always be allowed to idle before shutdown, especially right after a spirited drive, so that the oil continues to flow and cool down the turbo bearing. I'm rambling enough as is, so I won't go into the different affects of fossil vs synthetic oil. I'll just finally wrap up with that the antifreeze-cooled turbo avoids "coking" and coolant is more efficient than motor oil when it comes to heat absorption.
And I will respectfully accept that straightening out. My 2.0 etorque generator also has the same coolant lines that you described. I'm comforted to know that the unit is liquid cooled, which will shed heat more efficiently and stand a better chance against time. Thanks buddy!I would respectfully disagree on the eTorque generator being air cooled on the 3.6
My 2020 has 3 coolant reservoirs. The forward most one, in front of the windshield wiper fluid, has a line that goes directly to the front casing of the eTorque generator.