PavementWarrior
Well-Known Member
solid axles were mostly leaf spring designs other than fairly recently. The 70s ford bronco had springs and we used to make fun of its wacky design. I remember one writer of a 4x4 mag (what read read pre-internet for yuou young guys :P) claimed coil springs are only good for pogo sticks.Exactly. These factory alignment angles are not unique to the JL. They are founded in 100 years of producing millions of vehicles. What is it that people believe are novel or unique in design features in the JL that would be cause for different alignment geometry? I believe nothing is unique in our suspension or steering design that would warrant different alignment geometry.
I'm of the belief these issues are all about the details of the design, such as joint integrity, bushing spring rates, stiffness of steering links, stiffness of the Panhard (track) bar, etc..
But in any event, ya the stock suspension appears to mostly need a lilttle thicker tubing (no it does not need to be solod for most people), and better bushing. Everything has a quality yield, and the bushing appear to be way under a reasonable point.
90% in school gets you an A, on mass product its an F as you end up with 1000s of angry customers (this is one of the first things I teach young engineers out of school)
Sponsored