Possibly Two options with manual trans. the full electric will be manual trans according to the EJS concept. i realllllly hope its trueDamn!
This is a very interesting time and possibly the best time ever to buy a jeep. You have options for every possible use-case:
1. If money is no object and you must have the feel and sound of a V8, the 392 is available.
2. If you have a short commute and/or can charge your vehicle at work, the 4xE has you covered.
3. There’s an NA V6 and a 2.0 turbo available.
4. If you drive long distances you can get a diesel. Also great if you intend on adding weight.
Of course only two of these powertrains are available on the two door and only one with manual transmission unfortunately.
I bet you already know what you want given your current experience with jeeps. I say get exactly what you want even if it means waiting for a 2022, just be advised that Jeep is fond of pulling colors without warning!
Yeah lots to consider. Right now I’m just riding my mountain bike. Humbling to say the least. But I’m 30 years old I should know better. Hopefully I will from here on out.I think you'll find insurance rates will rise based on your accident alone. However, the vehicle you replace it with has little to do with the modeling any longer (leaving out the extremes of replacing a civic with a 911).
Take, for example, my 20 year old son who has 2 tickets. His insurance is the same on any Mustang - be it 5.0 or 4 cylinder. The models are based off of car, probability of accident, and repair cost of the vehicle. I doubt 392 vs 3.6 will have a meaningful impact to your insurance.
So buy what you like.
But I'm also one of the few people who fail to see the value of the 392 in a jeep. For me, the slow rolling and huge torque diesel are where it's at with big tires and rocks to get over.
Josiah, I sent you a PMYeah lots to consider. Right now I’m just riding my mountain bike. Humbling to say the least. But I’m 30 years old I should know better. Hopefully I will from here on out.
Huge torque diesel? It's 30 ftlbs less than the 392. Add in the 210 hp difference and one will be far more fun to drive both on road and off. From rock bouncers to king of the hammers, there's a reason why you rarely see diesels and yet you see a ton of big v8's. I'm in the minority of wrangler owners who regularly hit the speed limited in our lifted jlur on 37's both on the freeway and in the dirt, but anyone who has ever wheeled anywhere that is steep and/or slick enough to require some wheel speed to make it should appreciate what the 392 brings to the table. There's no such thing as too much horsepower, just too little traction. Granted I can't justify buying another jeep, but if I were in the market it would be hard not to go 392. 1 test drive would make it impossible.I think you'll find insurance rates will rise based on your accident alone. However, the vehicle you replace it with has little to do with the modeling any longer (leaving out the extremes of replacing a civic with a 911).
Take, for example, my 20 year old son who has 2 tickets. His insurance is the same on any Mustang - be it 5.0 or 4 cylinder. The models are based off of car, probability of accident, and repair cost of the vehicle. I doubt 392 vs 3.6 will have a meaningful impact to your insurance.
So buy what you like.
But I'm also one of the few people who fail to see the value of the 392 in a jeep. For me, the slow rolling and huge torque diesel are where it's at with big tires and rocks to get over.
where in the powerband is that tq vs the diesel? On my 3.0, it’s way down low where it’s usable. Wailing engines in the woods simply aren’t my cup of tea.Huge torque diesel? It's 30 ftlbs less than the 392. Add in the 210 hp difference and one will be far more fun to drive both on road and off. From rock bouncers to king of the hammers, there's a reason why you rarely see diesels and yet you see a ton of big v8's. I'm in the minority of wrangler owners who regularly hit the speed limited in our lifted jlur on 37's both on the freeway and in the dirt, but anyone who has ever wheeled anywhere that is steep and/or slick enough to require some wheel speed to make it should appreciate what the 392 brings to the table. There's no such thing as too much horsepower, just too little traction. Granted I can't justify buying another jeep, but if I were in the market it would be hard not to go 392. 1 test drive would make it impossible.
Agreed, Uconnect is hot garbage. I would not let Uconnect 5 be the deciding factor for me to buy or wait.Just replace the Infotainment system head end - good bye Uconnect