@DaveNH okay man, you have your opinion. I have mine. You do you boo boo.
Let's hope... after all, you've been wrong before having bought not one but two BMWsAfter some further thought, I personally find the 392 to be pointless. I initially thought it would be cool. I love fast cars and even love fast SUVs (see sig - my daily is a BMW X3M - look up the Car and Driver test for those that are not familiar). But all this will net Jeep is being the worst handling sub 5 second car in existence.
With this said, I may get one which, at the end of the day, proves that FCA may know what they're doing after all.
Hah! What makes me more wrong? That or two FCA products (I also have a 2017 Pacifica)?Let's hope... after all, you've been wrong before having bought not one but two BMWs
I've edited the post now...Hah! What makes me more wrong? That or two FCA products (I also have a 2017 Pacifica)?
Oh it has got to have manual but the way emissions are getting I am sure a manual would be banned from Cal. I live in Az. I think this is due to Fords new Bronco. The Bronco is super nice, but it has an annoying 4 cylinder turbo power plant. Honestly no thanks. I just sold a Honda Si with the pretty much the same engine. They come out with a 492 and I am going to have to have one...Had a 74 with a 304 in it and Holy Cow hold on 4 speedPlease offer with manual transmission
Based on what?just seems like FCA is a reaction company, not proactive
I wouldn’t dream about a manual. It’s not going to happen.Oh it has got to have manual but the way emissions are getting I am sure a manual would be banned from Cal. I live in Az. I think this is due to Fords new Bronco. The Bronco is super nice, but it has an annoying 4 cylinder turbo power plant. Honestly no thanks. I just sold a Honda Si with the pretty much the same engine. They come out with a 492 and I am going to have to have one...Had a 74 with a 304 in it and Holy Cow hold on 4 speed
Starting 1:16:30 in they begin to discuss the 392.I just subscribed today, so I'm not positive, but it's probably this one.
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/truckshowpodcast/Ep_130_Bonus_comp_v2.mp3?dest-id=671427
I have the same permission...but not if it’s 80k. id take a low optioned closer to $60k. More than that and I’ll just continue to enjoy my 3.6 and get a v8 car for the quick stuff.The future wife, if we can ever get married (3 wedding dates postponed now) just dropped a bit of a bomb shell on me. We were going to get her a new GC eventually but she said what if you get the "new one" and I take your Jeep. Now I can't get ordering a 392 out of my head.
I've considered the same. Keeping the JLU and ordering a C8 Vette has crossed my mind.I have the same permission...but not if it’s 80k. id take a low optioned closer to $60k. More than that and I’ll just continue to enjoy my 3.6 and get a v8 car for the quick stuff.