trbizwiz
Active Member
I second this, will there be one for the 2.0?No 2.0 love still?
Sponsored
I second this, will there be one for the 2.0?No 2.0 love still?
Good question. I am confident the testing was on an auto. Manual drivers would obviously get less benefits (not shifting with the cruise control buttons), but can a manual driver still benefit from the same or similar gains to HP and Torque?Those HP and torque numbers are nice. Was this tested on a manual or automatic transmission??
Looking forward to seeing someone here test this out.
Agreed. Something is off.Can you explain in what way the WHP was corrected? I have a hard time believing a stock JL was putting down 270whp.
Yet another company coming on here messing with dyno charts and expecting people to not know what they mean.Agreed. Something is off.
They're saying that the stock Jeep put down 320 ft. lbs. of torque, before the tune. Just by running on their dyno you get a 35 ft. lb. increase in torque and no measurable drive-train loss.
I have one, the tow performance is a very noticeable difference, they use different logic than tazer for the tire pressure warning and no front/rear setting (at least on my early version).Those HP and torque numbers are nice. Was this tested on a manual or automatic transmission??
Looking forward to seeing someone here test this out.
Nice! Did you try the performance booster option that adds 30 more horses? If so can you feel more pep?I have one, the tow performance is a very noticeable difference, they use different logic than tazer for the tire pressure warning and no front/rear setting (at least on my early version).
Doubt its a suppported idea to use a tazer with it, but with the tazer connected it may disconnect sway bar changing power settings on the fly,
I don’t run premium fuel so I just used the tow option which has enough extra torque to feel and use higher gears than normal.Nice! Did you try the performance booster option that adds 30 more horses? If so can you feel more pep?
Good catchSomething doesn't add up. Note the date on the bottom. 2/14/18. Unless this has been in the works that long ago. Is this graph for a different motor?
The correct dyno sheet has been added to the original postWhile this looks impressive I have my doubts. Peak HP for the Pentastar is at 6400 rpms, take a look at that dyno run it was cut off at 5500-5600 rpms. Stock numbers for the Jeep 3.6 is 285 hp & 6400 rpms. Looking at the Dyno run the HP curve starts to take a dive after 4800 rpms, I would expect HP to climb all the way to the peak at 6400 rpms. If we assume a 15% drivetrain loss then we would expect to see ~240 hp to the rear wheels.
The torque curve looks like it peaks at the correct location (4400-4600 rpms) however the max numbers seem high. Peak torque should be 260-270.