Very nice!
I have both, I must say I like the Moab for everyday driving, smooth drive , better ride. Just my personal opinion and the wife says the same thing.Hello, I’m the next few days I am looking to buy a wrangler jlu. I will be using it for heavy deep snow and other off-roading conditions (parts of rubicon possibly etc.) my price range is around 52 msrp and naturally the Moab and rubicon seem like good options. I like the leather and steel bumpers on Moab standard and the rubicon for that price point doesn’t have that. Also the v6 is normally in the Moab which I like. The rubicon however has lockers which I’m not sure their necessity and a slightly different ride height with bigger tires. I don’t loook to do to many modifications to either. If anyone has any input that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
They have the exact same suspension and the Moab has worse tires. What are you comparing to?I have both, I must say I like the Moab for everyday driving, smooth drive , better ride. Just my personal opinion and the wife says the same thing.
I've never seen siping on any MT tire (most AT tires have siping, so I'm not talking about those).It may be more for the KM2 specifically he was referring to. There's no siping on those.
Light snow shouldn't be any issue when its fresh. Its when it melts during the day and refreezes to a sheet of ice overnight is when you have your problems.I've never seen siping on any MT tire (most AT tires have siping, so I'm not talking about those).
No siping=no traction on ice or light snow. It really is that simple.
Rubicon. Lockers and sway bar over a bumper.....you can always get a bumper later.Hello, I’m the next few days I am looking to buy a wrangler jlu. I will be using it for heavy deep snow and other off-roading conditions (parts of rubicon possibly etc.) my price range is around 52 msrp and naturally the Moab and rubicon seem like good options. I like the leather and steel bumpers on Moab standard and the rubicon for that price point doesn’t have that. Also the v6 is normally in the Moab which I like. The rubicon however has lockers which I’m not sure their necessity and a slightly different ride height with bigger tires. I don’t loook to do to many modifications to either. If anyone has any input that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
It sounds like auto 4WD would be very useful for your needs. A MOAB is a nice rig. Has all the options which makes it easier to mod from that point on. As far as the MT KM2, people make a big deal out of them but that can be fixed easily by changing the tires. You have to change them out eventually anyway.Hello, I’m the next few days I am looking to buy a wrangler jlu. I will be using it for heavy deep snow and other off-roading conditions (parts of rubicon possibly etc.) my price range is around 52 msrp and naturally the Moab and rubicon seem like good options. I like the leather and steel bumpers on Moab standard and the rubicon for that price point doesn’t have that. Also the v6 is normally in the Moab which I like. The rubicon however has lockers which I’m not sure their necessity and a slightly different ride height with bigger tires. I don’t loook to do to many modifications to either. If anyone has any input that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Some MTs have blocks close enough that the grooves will hold snow in them which gives you snow-on-snow traction. In addition to rubber compounds and siping, snow-on-snow traction from retained snow in the treads is a big part of winter tire traction. A lot of MTs have huge grooves for shedding mud and will therefore shed too much snow to allow for snow-on-snow traction. Others will hold enough snow to be decent. But a lot of them are pretty hard rubber compounds in really cold temps and few other than some "hybrids" on the mild end have any siping at all. Siping is key, especially if there is any melting/salt/moisture on the road surface.Then why are certain MTs rated for snow? I have KM3 and they are M+S. Not trying to be argumentative but want to get the facts straight.