zdr
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Zach
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2021
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 340
- Reaction score
- 312
- Location
- Central PA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 Rubicon V6 6-Speed Manual
The OP's original question was reliability of the 2.0 vs the 3.6 W/ Etorque. It seems as if this thread became a 2.0 vs 3.6 debate with the 2.0 being considered less reliable but I didn't see a lot of Etorque being mentioned as if the 2.0 was being compared to a 3.6 without.
I have a 3.6 6 speed but have driven a 3.0 Ecodiesel and my girl has a 3.6 with etorque. I havn't driven or heard a 2.0. I'm very grateful for the knowledgable posters on this forum, very helpful.
To take it a step further, say you were concerned about the longevity/reliability on these two platforms, 2.0T vs. 3.6w/Etorque and the ability to perform and sustain power with 35's (4.10 Rubicon). From what I have read on here, the 2.0 handles this a little better? The 2.0T is also approx. $1,250 cheaper.
Thanks!
I have a 3.6 6 speed but have driven a 3.0 Ecodiesel and my girl has a 3.6 with etorque. I havn't driven or heard a 2.0. I'm very grateful for the knowledgable posters on this forum, very helpful.
To take it a step further, say you were concerned about the longevity/reliability on these two platforms, 2.0T vs. 3.6w/Etorque and the ability to perform and sustain power with 35's (4.10 Rubicon). From what I have read on here, the 2.0 handles this a little better? The 2.0T is also approx. $1,250 cheaper.
Thanks!
Sponsored