- First Name
- Kendall
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
- Threads
- 8
- Messages
- 337
- Reaction score
- 526
- Location
- Santa Clarita, CA
- Vehicle(s)
- 2018 Rubicon
There's likely a different explanation - let me explain why. When you are building a turbo application, sizing of the turbo is very important. For the best possible performance, you want to be on-boost as early in the RPM range as possible to 1) mitigate turbo lag, and; 2) provide as much power under the curve as possible. In order to do this, you want to select as small of a turbo as possible - and which will still deliver the desired level of boost. The smaller the turbo, the lighter the impeller and the faster you can get it to spool. (This is also one of the principles in twin turbos - where each turbo can be smaller, lighter and faster-spooling than a single larger turbo.) In your example, 8 psi was likely the approximate max-boost Prodigy was looking for and as such the chosen turbo would simply be incapable of delivery even 15psi of boost let alone above 20psi.According to the log as I hit WOT the boost instead of being limited to 8 psi spiked to 29 pst at which time the engine gave up, no wonder.
It is so easy to armchair quarterback... but IMHO, it is almost inexcusable to have engine failures on a dyno. You have so many opportunities to do pre-runs up to limited rpms and limited boost. Each of these successive pulls provide you feedback that you are in control of the engine (the way that you think you are). Additionally, you want to have agreed "wave-off" figures for minimally boost and A/Fs and when/if someone spots an anomaly the pull is terminated - immediately.
We've used Turbosmart controllers many, many times and have inadvertently plumbed them incorrectly more times than I would like to admit but we've never had a bad controller. Its always the mass between the ears.
Sponsored