1.5 year(s)
The first 2.0L wasnt delivered until mid July of last year, so 9 months at the most.
I’ve had my 2.0 for 8 months - zero oil use, can’t see any change on the dipstick. Theory is nice of course, but you can’t argue with reality.
The Giulia / Stelvio 2.0T were the foundation for development, as there's a substantial amount of crossover on the drivetrain and drivetrain electronics. As this is a piggyback unit (not a direct flash), compatibility with the Wrangler was determinable almost immediately, and then it was just a matter of testing and abuse - both things we're pretty good at.
Hi. We've run into oil consumption issues out of the box on a few other FCA turbocharged engines - so that just seems like a blanket statement. Not a specific to this 2.0 . We're not running into that problem on this one, but it's a smaller sample group at this point - and there's no dipstick.
Warranties are a funny thing. I've seen a Subaru STI show up on a flatbed, direct from a track day, rubber caked in the wheelwells - for a warranty replacement of the transmission. I've also seen a Mercedes C300 voided out for aftermarket LED bulbs. As with anything, mod to your comfort level, and your dealership may have a lot of influence in where that comfort level sits.and yes we should start using NSFW in the titles for these tuner threads.. Not Suitable for Factory Warranties
Hi aai, I clicked on OP's link, but I'm not seeing an immediate Alfa Romeo reference. If that's something the IT department can address, I can make sure that gets done. As Alfa Romeo is often at the top of the A-Z list for Vehicle Makes, sometimes that can pop up in places as databases populate.
I think that's a task best suited for a vendor account. There's more dyno sheets, but it's all the same information, same numbers, different timestamps. What specific info are you looking for?
