richk225
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Rich
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2018
- Threads
- 97
- Messages
- 1,669
- Reaction score
- 1,298
- Location
- New Jersey
- Vehicle(s)
- 2021 392Rubicon XR 2017 Jeep Grand Cherokee
- Occupation
- retired due to broken back
You would think that Jeep would finally get it right after all these years of JL steering issues
I have read on this site the 392 Rubicon uses the same lower control arms as other Jeeps, but they did decide to put a somewhat taller coil spring up front so why not use the lower control arms that they use with lift kit.
I would think that the engineers would realize that your Caster numbers are going the decrease when you lift a Jeep???
I have read on this site the 392 Rubicon uses the same lower control arms as other Jeeps, but they did decide to put a somewhat taller coil spring up front so why not use the lower control arms that they use with lift kit.
I would think that the engineers would realize that your Caster numbers are going the decrease when you lift a Jeep???
Sponsored