Zandcwhite
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Zach
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2019
- Threads
- 10
- Messages
- 5,831
- Reaction score
- 10,376
- Location
- Patterson, ca
- Vehicle(s)
- 2019 jlur
You're paying $5k for fake beadlocks and a 1.5" lift? And another $5k for cai and shocks? Not arguing the 392s performance, but your fuzzy math to close the gap is as big a stretch as the JL guys comparing power to weight. Personally I prefer the black top and fenders vs painted so the difference ends up quite a bit larger as the 392 has me buying options I don't want. I'm only about $10k into the build of the wife's JLUR with the xr package and its got full belly skids, metalcloak 3.5" lift, flipped drag link, actual fox 2.0s with 12" of travel(50% more than the 392 version),and 39s. Only paid $58k and it's loaded with just about every other option aside from painted parts I didn't want. It doesn't have anywhere near the power of the 392, but it's got better steering, suspension, protection, a winch, and massively better approach/departure/breakover angle and was still $10k cheaper all in. For that remaining $10k it could easily get a supercharger and cai(you know they aren't actually $5k) on the v6 and be comparable in power.And all too often used to support arguments. Example— “a V8 costs $20/30/40 K more”. Before purchase I compared it to a diesel. My build with all the same options as “standard” — $77.6 K vs just under $68K. Add the lift and beadlock capable the difference was ~ $5K. Granted the diesel wasn’t cheap either, but it wasn’t $15K extra or more. I wasn’t interested in the other options…..
Sponsored